From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: Gnus links very slow to open Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:46:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87sl53xk4m.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87k5r0kfwa.fsf@cantor.griswold.home> <874phjy6vq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87abrbrzfa.fsf@aka.i.naked.iki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ia57y-0004sg-9R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 03:46:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ia57w-0004qb-Fk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 03:46:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ia57w-0004qO-As for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 03:46:40 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.189]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ia57v-0006A7-Sx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 03:46:40 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so1440150nfh for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:46:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87abrbrzfa.fsf@aka.i.naked.iki.fi> (Nuutti Kotivuori's message of "Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:12:41 +0300") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Cc: Leo Nuutti Kotivuori writes: > Bastien wrote: >> Leo writes: >>> Upon opening a link, org calls gnus-other-frame which would try to get >>> new emails first and then switch to the group buffer. >> >> What would be the way to invoke Gnus without it to fetch new mails? >> >> If we find this, then we can put it in the `org-link-frame-setup' >> variable. > > Gnus does not fetch new mails on gnus-other-frame. I think Leo has > customized some gnus hook to automatically fetch mail when gnus starts > - and that is getting carried over to here as well. Leo, maybe `nnml-get-new-mail' being t is the culprit? -- Bastien