From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:17:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87sl1gtlh9.fsf@member.fsf.org> References: <20071230122217.3CA84830B9A@snark.thyrsus.com> <20071231131129.GA2737@muc.de> <20071231152509.GC8641@thyrsus.com> <20080101203433.GG3830@muc.de> <20080101205757.GB11934@thyrsus.com> <20080102122923.GG17588@thyrsus.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199279889 15180 80.91.229.12 (2 Jan 2008 13:18:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 13:18:09 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 02 14:18:28 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JA3UH-0001yc-W5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:18:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JA3Tv-0003Md-QY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:18:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JA3Tr-0003KA-Uw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:18:00 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JA3Tp-0003Gv-6z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:17:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JA3Tp-0003Ge-2S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:17:57 -0500 Original-Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JA3To-0002kB-Vr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:17:57 -0500 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823025732E for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2008 08:17:56 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:17:56 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: /WZW6ZJPB888nx6lx8UsBfF9WPJ+pQbZWCQwS8+1oLnC 1199279876 Original-Received: from baldur (dslb-084-063-049-086.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.63.49.86]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D1823981 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2008 08:17:55 -0500 (EST) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (dhruva's message of "Wed, 2 Jan 2008 18:29:22 +0530") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85892 Archived-At: dhruva writes: Hi, > Anyone pitching in for mercurial (hg)? Before everybody posts his favourite SCM I'd say we wait until Eric finished his comparison paper. Then we'll have all pros and cons side by side and choose whichever fits our needs best. Talking about portability, git does run on anything POSIX and there's a fork for Windows (without cygwin), which is merged into the main line right now. (Maybe its already finished.) Bye, Tassilo