From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:28:12 -0400
Message-ID: <87skvpky5f.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
References: <871w39mcx5.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1212856106 14042 80.91.229.12 (7 Jun 2008 16:28:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 16:28:26 +0000 (UTC)
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 07 18:29:09 2008
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1K51Hv-0005wh-7y
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 18:29:07 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48305 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1K51H8-00086j-7O
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:28:18 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1K51H4-00086K-NL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:28:14 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1K51H2-00085y-Rg
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:28:13 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50126 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K51H2-00085s-OT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:28:12 -0400
Original-Received: from c-98-216-111-182.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.216.111.182]:11229
	helo=furry) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <cyd@stupidchicken.com>) id 1K51H2-0001Ps-Lf
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:28:12 -0400
Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id CEEF7C055; Sat,  7 Jun 2008 12:28:12 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <871w39mcx5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of
	"Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:23:50 -0400")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98594
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/98594>

Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com> writes:

> It seems to me that the default Emacs fonts should attempt to define a
> font family, now that we have the new font backend.

I mean, that the default Emacs fonts should *not* attempt to define a
font family.