From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: emacs documentation: what's active voice, passive voice? Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 22:50:01 +0200 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <87sk0natmu.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <4ca8659e$0$50453$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <322eca01-3bf5-4078-9439-57ba9503afc6@k1g2000prl.googlegroups.com> <877hhz6p8n.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291870973 15396 80.91.229.12 (9 Dec 2010 05:02:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 05:02:53 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 09 06:02:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PQYeX-0006Wk-Dc for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 06:02:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59325 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PQYeX-0003gv-38 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:02:49 -0500 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!news-2.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!news.belwue.de!newsfeed.ision.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!ision!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:fC4bk2Q8VnQqKmVEKW/HEuexzyA= Original-Lines: 12 Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 03 Oct 2010 22:50:01 CEST Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 7270bf1e.newsspool4.arcor-online.net Original-X-Trace: DXC=E8R6KoS6hRA0YVY]kmLTlD4IUK5MOK`al0oRJJ]1H1PlZB>Jh76R6?; OkRD Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:181622 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:76702 Archived-At: Jay Belanger writes: >> Then I would have to write "I varied the parameters and ran the test >> again." That just doesn't strike me as good style for a technical >> paper. > > Why not? The next test run used a different set of parameters. -- David Kastrup