From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: rainbow-mode Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:05:18 -0600 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87sjz171ht.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87mxpabjj3.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <8762vyz5rl.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <5D7ECAE48B634FAEAA14E2BDCA4EAAD7@us.oracle.com> <8762vxetuf.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87r5el8iwg.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871v6l8h0s.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1289920228 9114 80.91.229.12 (16 Nov 2010 15:10:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:10:28 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 16 16:10:24 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PINAt-0007Ut-I6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:10:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54521 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PINAt-0007DP-1C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:10:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56514 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PIN6C-0004Bm-T2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:05:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PIN69-0007X8-Bn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:05:32 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:59391) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PIN68-0007X0-Uv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:05:29 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PIN68-0004fL-CZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:05:28 +0100 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:05:28 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:05:28 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 29 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:0ST3P3WSdpfInmBg9T2olGlEriA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132720 Archived-At: On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:50:25 +0100 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> Plus Chong Yidong explained in this thread and in >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/127873/focus=128245 LMI> I've read the thread. There was discussion, Julien added stuff to LMI> rainbow-mode as suggested, and then Chong said "I've added rainbow-mode LMI> to the Emacs 24 package repository.", and that ended the discussion. LMI> Is that an unfair summation of that thread? He also said he would add the others if proposed, meaning (I think) none of them were ready. I simply added rainbow-mode.el from the package repository at that point because it was enough for me. >> FWIW my vote is still for rainbow-mode.el as follows: I think it's most >> useful in its current form out of all the contenders. I would put it in >> the core Emacs because editing CSS and HTML (plus other languages with >> inlined colors) is so common. The color transformation functions it has >> are generally useful. I would also give it first-class customization >> variables so it's really easy to turn it on. Finally, it's pretty >> unlikely to undergo big changes at this point. LMI> I agree 100%. If the maintainers agree too, I'll work with Julien to make this happen. Ted