From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: where to send patches Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:24:30 -0500 Message-ID: <87sjuwjb41.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87y652bt1a.fsf@gmx.at> <6goc5kcbu4.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299702289 6878 80.91.229.12 (9 Mar 2011 20:24:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Rottmann , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 09 21:24:44 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PxPw4-0006jo-Jn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:24:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59191 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxPw3-0007fd-T6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:24:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39525 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxPvy-0007em-LF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:24:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxPvt-0007Ru-U2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:24:38 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.144]:60563) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxPvs-0007Ri-Qy; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:24:32 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014010.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p29KOUuF023235 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:24:30 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E2CCC160606; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:24:30 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <6goc5kcbu4.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:50:43 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.144 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.144 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136994 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > I did think about adding "Severity: normal" to the M-x report-emacs-bug > boilerplate, and inviting people to adjust it if they wished. But maybe > it makes reporting more complicated for little gain? It should be for Emacs developers to decide bug severity, not the reporters.