From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2066: Face `unspecified' inheritance ignores face-remapping-alist Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 17:38:49 +0800 Message-ID: <87sje49652.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ocxs4l0n.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <04C65FC9-24BD-404B-852C-5B685CA03608@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339234785 8194 80.91.229.3 (9 Jun 2012 09:39:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 09:39:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2066@debbugs.gnu.org To: David Reitter Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 09 11:39:44 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SdI91-00015x-QO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 11:39:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44314 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdI91-0004FP-Ei for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 05:39:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdI8x-0004F6-Lp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 05:39:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdI8w-0006eQ-1l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 05:39:39 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54420) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdI8v-0006eM-UV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 05:39:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SdIBF-0006Ls-Ow for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 05:42:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 09:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 2066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B2066.133923488424359 (code B ref 2066); Sat, 09 Jun 2012 09:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2012 09:41:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35730 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SdIAe-0006Kq-Me for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 05:41:24 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:40954) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SdIAc-0006Kj-4k for 2066@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 05:41:22 -0400 Original-Received: from cm162.gamma80.maxonline.com.sg ([202.156.80.162]:45712 helo=ulysses) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdI8F-00027Z-O9; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 05:38:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <04C65FC9-24BD-404B-852C-5B685CA03608@gmail.com> (David Reitter's message of "Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:46:44 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:60799 Archived-At: David Reitter writes: >> I don't see any bug here. The "test" string inserted into the buffer >> has a background different from `highlight', but that's because its >> background is not unspecified: > > You are right, mea culpa. My test case wasn't correct. > > To reproduce, we also need overlays with before/after-string > properties. Fixed in trunk. Thanks for pointing this bug out.