From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: problems with flet on last emacs Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 21:42:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87sjdgmthk.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <87pq8lnd7v.fsf@gmail.com> <87ehp099bb.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87sjdgq0ig.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> <87y5n87nr2.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <871ul0pvko.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340826183 6828 80.91.229.3 (27 Jun 2012 19:43:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Pascal J. Bourguignon" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 27 21:43:02 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sjy8j-0003Ih-JI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 21:43:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44465 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sjy8j-0000ag-DC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:43:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35311) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sjy8g-0000aP-C6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:42:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sjy8Z-0000ES-VP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:42:57 -0400 Original-Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:43869) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sjy8Z-0000Df-Mm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:42:51 -0400 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5192144F; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:42:50 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:42:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=hhtQ+shXpBwWib1tbONlHJnJOBc=; b=E93yOH/2xk+OxShp+whV2tDH8jXv GtE5a1DtrYeofPiBjhZrigmESvvojPgpCE3yM6x6KW1dHflaFygm5hsc9W3KaBeK /4RhOnHJ1ssEwzNqi9g9sEOAGPsaqD83+tKQzYa1OnpRVTO6+Ft/GfgTXV4+RhKy A39tEEctofXQ1C0= X-Sasl-enc: L9gruXgAQd6ZzOUa5Y1PMmxjLBcoVAfMN1j791170nDD 1340826169 Original-Received: from thinkpad.tsdh.de (unknown [91.67.9.216]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9460A4836DC; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:42:49 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <871ul0pvko.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> (Pascal J. Bourguignon's message of "Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:29:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 66.111.4.27 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151235 Archived-At: "Pascal J. Bourguignon" writes: >> Ok, both are nil, so x and x are different symbols. cl uses macroexp's >> macro expansion macros at various places, and `macroexp-let2' uses >> (make-symbol "x") to create new symbols. That's not making it easier to >> understand... > > That'd be a "bug" in the emacs lisp printer. > > > Symbols that are not interned in any package should be printed with > the #: prefix. eg. in emacs-version "23.4.2", (make-symbol "x") --> > #:x Are you sure you haven't set `print-gensym'? If that's nil, it prints just x here (Emacs 24.1). And even then you can't distinguish #:x and #:x just by looking at the expansion. For that, you need `print-circle', too. Bye, Tassilo