From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Alan Dorman Subject: Re: BUG: coderef labels not stripped when tangling Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:45:17 -0500 Message-ID: <87sj5qu236.fsf@ironicdesign.com> References: <87ehhcuk1i.fsf@ironicdesign.com> <86ehhbhqx6.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyN7P-000111-TX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:45:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyN7K-0003wI-Di for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:45:27 -0500 Received: from portia.ironicdesign.com ([206.166.194.232]:49012) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyN7K-0003vh-9C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:45:22 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by portia.ironicdesign.com (Postfix) with QMQP id DDFA918A8095 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 07:45:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from ogg.local (cpe-024-211-190-016.nc.res.rr.com [24.211.190.16]) (Authenticated sender: mdorman@ironicdesign.com) by incoming.antespam.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4929C1D941A8 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 07:45:18 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <86ehhbhqx6.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:27:17 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, Sebastien, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Or a feature, with the consequence that you should put those refs as comments > (with the appropriate syntax in your language). That is an excellent suggestion for resolving my immediate issue that had not occured to me at all. It believe it does mean that the presentation of the code ends up with seemingly empty comments where the coderefs were, but that's a relatively minor thing. > But, yes, those comments stay as well in your tangled code, which you may not > like. It seems counter-intuitive to me that text that is regarded as meta-information when rendering for presentation is not treated similarly when tangling---a needless mismatch between the two processes. But thanks for your workaround suggestion, I will definitely take advantage of it. Mike.