From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Eshell and Sudo Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:20:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87sj4t4eem.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87ehgg451n.fsf@gnu.org> <87txpc3wnn.fsf@gmx.de> <87wqu6u91q.fsf@gmx.de> <8738wulqvd.fsf@dimension8.tehua.net> <87fw0uu4c6.fsf@gmx.de> <8738wur054.fsf@dimension8.tehua.net> <87ppzyxl94.fsf@gmx.de> <87d2vxsou7.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361215262 23605 80.91.229.3 (18 Feb 2013 19:21:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Aidan Gauland , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 18 20:21:24 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U7WHD-0006l2-65 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:21:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41701 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7WGt-0001aE-6G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:21:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47603) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7WGq-0001Zq-E8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:21:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7WGm-0002HH-Ue for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:21:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:60219) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7WGm-0002GX-M8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:20:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.29]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MY1JW-1UKbB80kqW-00Us0i for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:20:54 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2013 19:20:53 -0000 Original-Received: from p57BB97C2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO detlef.gmx.de) [87.187.151.194] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 18 Feb 2013 20:20:53 +0100 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/8+mJauG385uBsib7hBEETDrVwhXKzLAlFjHTopO xe0LJhzXh223sr In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:24:13 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157141 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >>> They don't look "obviously safe" to me, so it'd only be OK on emacs-24 >>> if it's a regression. IOW: "how old is this problem"? >> Regression wrt Emacs 24.2. I've started "emacs -Q" of > > OK for emacs-24, then, Done. > Stefan Best regards, Michael.