From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thorsten Jolitz Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files? Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:04:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87sj30jfiw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87hajhswdh.fsf@gmail.com> <8738v0fxw7.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365494715 9905 80.91.229.3 (9 Apr 2013 08:05:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 08:05:15 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 09 10:05:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UPTYM-0001FC-P0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:05:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41867 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPTYM-0005bg-84 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 04:05:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36568) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPTYE-0005TT-4L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 04:05:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPTY9-0003NW-LO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 04:05:10 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43208) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPTY9-0003MT-G4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 04:05:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UPTY6-0000x3-OG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:05:02 +0200 Original-Received: from e178058213.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.58.213]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:05:02 +0200 Original-Received: from tjolitz by e178058213.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:05:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e178058213.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:mmUKAJj4KxwAFeOiWoqvR+USDZM= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158794 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> But the lisp convention is the opposite: > > Right, that's because Lisp didn't think it through. > Luckily, we're only dealing with Elisp, So what is the official Elisp convention then: ,------------------------ | ;;; * level 1 | ;;;; ** level 2 | ;;;;; *** level 3 `------------------------ or ,------------------------- | ;;;;; * level 1 | ;;;; ** level 2 | ;;; *** level 3 `------------------------- ? -- cheers, Thorsten