From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eww Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 08:34:55 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87sizpxma8.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87d2rkb1pi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87fvwfa3ev.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87k3l96gna.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ehbb1zs5.fsf@building.gnus.org> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373287220 14154 80.91.229.3 (8 Jul 2013 12:40:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:40:20 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 08 14:40:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UwAjq-0003Ac-AW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:40:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39484 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwAjp-0002b2-SZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 08:40:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwAjj-0002Us-6i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 08:40:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwAje-0003J1-Vx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 08:40:11 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:37602) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwAje-0003G5-OZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 08:40:06 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UwAjb-0002tp-QP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:40:03 +0200 Original-Received: from pool-72-70-84-160.bstnma.east.verizon.net ([72.70.84.160]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:40:03 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by pool-72-70-84-160.bstnma.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:40:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 26 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-72-70-84-160.bstnma.east.verizon.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:AXiqD878cPSYIslPUSwwdqv9IWU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161725 Archived-At: On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 17:19:54 +0200 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: LI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> I'm not sure I understand all the buffer magic eww does, so here's an >> attempt to provide `eww-view-source' under `v' (right now it just calls >> `debug' on the data). If I edebug `eww-view-source' it has the right >> data, but I think something is getting lost in translation because the >> data doesn't show up when I actually hit `v'. LI> Calling `debug' is probably not the right thing to do. I know, but it wasn't working for me so I left it like that :) Do you mean to say it works for you? If so, there must be something wrong with my setup! LI> Just pop to a buffer called "*eww source*" or something, with a very LI> minor mode that would just bind `q' to exit. LI> But otherwise, looks good. Please apply. :-) As Xue suggested I can use `special-mode' (which gets my award for Unhelpful Name of the Year, btw). But if you tested this and it worked, why is it failing for me? Hmm. Ted