From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15900: 24.3.50; foreground-color-at-point returns wrong results Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 08:50:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87siuum9ma.fsf@web.de> References: <69fed86b-8fdb-4563-88f5-715dc7fce1be@default> <83bo1ihqe9.fsf@gnu.org> <87a9h264do.fsf@web.de> <8361rqgyui.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384761074 22008 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2013 07:51:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 07:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15900@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 18 08:51:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ViJc5-0000dF-1d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 08:51:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41718 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ViJc4-00073e-Li for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 02:51:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ViJbw-00073Q-Op for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 02:51:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ViJbq-0007f7-UB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 02:51:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45409) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ViJbq-0007f3-QK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 02:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ViJbq-00074J-7j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 02:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 07:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15900 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15900-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15900.138476105427157 (code B ref 15900); Mon, 18 Nov 2013 07:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15900) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2013 07:50:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59428 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ViJbh-00073v-Nc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 02:50:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:53510) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ViJbe-00073f-D4 for 15900@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 02:50:51 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.186.252.235]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb004) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MJpnI-1VjPXD114G-001EOe for <15900@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 08:50:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8361rqgyui.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 18 Nov 2013 05:42:13 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:19YUJef8lLhfaeLOHjwH97tyccL36n8wOyjtiFnZYZn/cuYL/Vh 3AjSJAb16TckWvCbijyYtW4rcccXRsmv6NxC8H/ATVVUAhaz8pzV3CMjoq3cFIxrNbhJKUu zSSi0+j5Zgrk2PGHxyGJ4a+kIKn6O/Ey0RgHz1+9atNtgJ8eV1VLCLM7a6yj0g6p185lyUC 7aCQ4jSPkCu2PNGAawKbg== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80714 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > There's no difficulty. > > Then I don't understand why you still want to analyze colors instead > of analyzing faces. This is what my suggestion boiled down to: > instead of trying to figure out the foreground color of the text at > point, just compare its face(s) with a list of known faces whose > appearance you don't want to override. Ok, I think now I understand your point. And I see that my approach has its difficulties: faces can be customized (a foreground attribute can be removed or added), faces can even be frame dependent, etc. What I do is just a heuristic. Mmh, let me think about it. Thanks for your opinion. Regards, Michael.