From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16153: 24.3.50; (gv-ref (car (cdr x))) => strange expression Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 01:32:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87sittbpp2.fsf@web.de> References: <87haaad3v2.fsf@web.de> <87zjo2ppy3.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387153996 13469 80.91.229.3 (16 Dec 2013 00:33:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16153@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 16 01:33:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VsM7Z-0003Fb-F3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 01:33:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53040 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsM7Y-0000SO-Sc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:33:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36124) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsM7R-0000S9-C2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:33:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsM7K-0001wc-52 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:33:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38386) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsM7K-0001wW-1j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VsM7J-0006Ow-RI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:33:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16153 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 16153-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16153.138715396724582 (code B ref 16153); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16153) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2013 00:32:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52405 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VsM74-0006OQ-QN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:32:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:64293) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VsM72-0006OF-HV for 16153@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:32:45 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.186.202.31]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MHY1o-1Vp3G20OFA-003Oma for <16153@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 01:32:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 15 Dec 2013 08:02:47 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:m8VS7hfkksfSqWeOgu47uLifnrTQ0OsaO1MLL26bu4o48Q4SM7a MZnC1kOxaxtpZrd5gGkj3xSG7lfL4XdvE/R3chiXabQHhPig7EhtqMijSevof49z+yCQOBE pu7WxBaws4eKzRWiFqNM0hSdhVprAgisJuh7twxx1BnzrUXgw2TkB1FRIZXMe0jEIxYEx4Z U5hYueEtIkwqguYw9l5XA== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82037 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > In general, `gv-ref' only works with lexical-binding. I see. Maybe say this somewhere - in the doc string, or at least in the source code. It's IMHO not obvious (or is it?). Thanks, Michael.