From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eww Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 23:36:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87sisqyyw2.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87zjn0gmas.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87fvorbjuh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87r48aaog5.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <878uui6cqr.fsf@yahoo.fr> <87k3e2ldpd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <52D56C90.7000902@yahoo.fr> <87y52ijufd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vbxm45du.fsf@yahoo.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389738989 11670 80.91.229.3 (14 Jan 2014 22:36:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 22:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Nicolas Richard" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 14 23:36:35 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W3Cb2-00081K-0E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 23:36:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51027 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3Cb1-0007te-FK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:36:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43388) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3Cau-0007sa-7Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:36:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3Cap-00036f-1H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:36:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]:63510) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3Cao-00036R-Pi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:36:18 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id t60so1030918wes.37 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:36:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=wxXHIPqIHdYyIdwYNLBaPmvsy2+0oUBAqG5D0wMVJjo=; b=iQKbDAyKpGrDNjaI+5KEzRxYTcLVxGRLrEth2FIBw5Z6KMwh9Jxt7PpBYaQHhu3ket IiBp//hGUkMrc6cmycHTshCMQdtaY6+wyldj6gznBbTO6FaamlYGmERNMorvXsDJliAE MEgiD7CVHAt2mhuysthXAeFBcH/h+qjH/G8iDLYRTj2eIOms+lz8ongsUbuJ1k2rqTOA OVxnsoKk3pD7kuUPUKa5KlENQZS8cHOoImf9LpuG9w+KIItvtinjbCveVlfdeU8gbVhz f6kqDCDHC/GBNufjqY7/QI+O/B/DVtvN18lDExRFVyoVvcECYRil/sdWeEVlrmz+BsSV 1cuA== X-Received: by 10.180.108.240 with SMTP id hn16mr5207952wib.5.1389738977628; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:36:17 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hv3sm3616205wib.5.2014.01.14.14.36.14 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:36:15 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 43B1A1C20860; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 23:36:13 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87vbxm45du.fsf@yahoo.fr> (Nicolas Richard's message of "Tue, 14 Jan 2014 22:31:41 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c03::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168405 Archived-At: "Nicolas Richard" writes: > Oops, I'm sorry, I made the test with the wrong file and thus gave the > wrong recipe. > > Try this as a web.el: > ;; some useful comments > (define-alternatives web) > ;; End of file. Ahhh, okay! (I did not try this use-case because I don't see the point of using (define-alternatives ...) without defining the set of alternatives.) I applied the patch, thanks for your patience. -- Bastien