From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Welsh Duggan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-x SPC : rectangle-mark-mode or gud-break? Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 19:39:22 -0500 Message-ID: <87sisokbet.fsf@maru2.md5i.com> References: <8738lo7hbz.fsf@maru2.md5i.com> <87zjmxjd6e.fsf@maru2.md5i.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389832782 6282 80.91.229.3 (16 Jan 2014 00:39:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Welsh Duggan , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 16 01:39:48 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W3azk-0004LD-QJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 01:39:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57859 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3azk-0005pP-3V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 19:39:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39951) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3azc-0005en-Pi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 19:39:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3azY-0004G9-CB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 19:39:32 -0500 Original-Received: from md5i.com ([75.151.244.229]:57577 helo=maru2.md5i.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3azY-0004G4-5b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 19:39:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=md5i.com; s=dkim; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=x3aZ3FzzPjyebgzXIoataBLX48EjeoRb7O9s9f4BM3M=; b=oKKCmYeszao4PlhI5e7jN3GiVtYcAcmuTFi57ihChpyciDM/4EPdPhwgBXz+rcS6XGE3aYArq+zR7ySP2x/ZZ6IC7PMQo+axJU8AJRog1SA+rxd1KZMasoBMCcc+Xdak; Original-Received: from md5i by maru2.md5i.com with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1W3azS-0003wt-K6; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 19:39:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:45:27 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 75.151.244.229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168511 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> highly doubt people are using `C-x C-a C-b'.) I guess I'll just have to >> suggest rebinding it in gud-gdb-mode-hook to people who like it better >> the way it was before. > > Some people suggested to rebind it in prog-mode buffers, based on the > assumption that the rectangle commands are not very useful in > programming language modes, whereas GUD bindings are only useful there. That would be good, certainly. Is there a reliable way to tell the difference between a programming mode and another mode? -- Michael Welsh Duggan (md5i@md5i.com)