From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 21:44:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87sisjln18.fsf@engster.org> References: <87fvqtg02v.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87vbyk3497.fsf@yandex.ru> <87haa4gw69.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87txe4usm1.fsf@yandex.ru> <87zjnvg2t2.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87txe364q0.fsf@yandex.ru> <87r497fu0h.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87haa1litl.fsf@yandex.ru> <87y53czx7e.fsf@yandex.ru> <87bo08bivm.fsf_-_@flea.lifelogs.com> <87sitkzahs.fsf@yandex.ru> <52D7DAAB.2070709@yandex.ru> <52D81960.2080408@yandex.ru> <52DA8C17.4080707@yandex.ru> <52DC00E5.3020803@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390164294 15395 80.91.229.3 (19 Jan 2014 20:44:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 20:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 19 21:45:02 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W4zEp-0003B1-OV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 21:44:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47602 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4zEp-00063u-EU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 15:44:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52767) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4zEh-0005vl-F3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 15:44:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4zEb-00056o-Tk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 15:44:51 -0500 Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([5.45.97.173]:37539) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4zEb-000567-Iu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 15:44:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=randomsample.de; s=a; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=O5Zd+MsxtEBgY/JZ9vwZ9Tu6+j8wUNCIYEIrTd+871Q=; b=j6JGCboUEmArvCokkmYzOINgZdIbPtx6GvsmWrktflzihPIF6n2yRVpENVU1P3hLBHEPFIyYXwMuFy6PlqkQ/XbeV9g+RHHt3rJluqGkSCoa6a+dpzOO+M0ZVGs4WqVY; Original-Received: from dslc-082-083-051-130.pools.arcor-ip.net ([82.83.51.130] helo=spaten) by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W4zET-0000L3-Is; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 21:44:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 19 Jan 2014 15:19:42 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Followup-To: Stefan Monnier , Dmitry Gutov , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 5.45.97.173 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168753 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Sometime ago I've been told that RMS dislikes Clang strongly enough to >> oppose inclusion of any code using it in Emacs. > > AFAIK Clang is Free Software. So, I don't see a valid reason to reject > inclusion of company-clang or equivalent into Emacs. We had this discussion here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/155124 While RMS does not state it explicitly there, he has asked me to not merge our semantic-clang file in CEDET to Emacs, which is also why I have given up on Clang for improving our C/C++ parser. -David