From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17531: 24.4.50; REGRESSION: `cancel-debug-on-error' no longer works Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 18:18:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87sinv5h5x.fsf@web.de> References: <9e69df23-fdc9-4a33-8f69-76faf1d7eddf@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401207632 10483 80.91.229.3 (27 May 2014 16:20:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 16:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17531@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 27 18:20:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WpK6y-0005Pp-1X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 18:20:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36446 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpK6x-0008Uv-0K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 12:20:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39619) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpK6m-00082E-DH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 12:20:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpK6e-0008SV-0s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 12:20:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpK6d-0008RU-QM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 12:20:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WpK6c-0000km-UW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 12:20:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 16:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17531 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17531-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17531.14012075432811 (code B ref 17531); Tue, 27 May 2014 16:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17531) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2014 16:19:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33580 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WpK5a-0000iu-5P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 12:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:53148) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WpK5S-0000iU-Vx for 17531@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 12:18:55 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.187.47.11]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MCqkB-1Wyubc3dVT-009hRd; Tue, 27 May 2014 18:18:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 27 May 2014 08:30:24 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.91 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:R+l8maZovht4tO2BgsKMjNjoteoy1RONGhqZPYzS3Pm3NbgSoIn VO3POB0R6RH9Uoa+wcBcdh/xGgrVmjJbOneY9YRSh+i5vBzujG7yUS+tL10jHxq7mi79lcl Hh5uZZA4zCW+uHMKDDOqqzMBmBKVWaHOa2iEk9+C10wgc4CCEtd7CiLl7/d4yiIsje0lWVo eZimlK9m/EhftGgTIY5KA== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89562 Archived-At: Hi Drew, > > Thanks. I installed a fix for it in the emacs-24 branch. > > But not in the trunk, perhaps? Indeed. AFAICT, the standard procedure for fixes in the release branch is not to install in both branches in parallel, but, in our case, to install only in emacs-24. Changes are merged back into trunk regularly (once a week?). I guess you just have to wait some time. > Should we expect that it is fixed in trunk also? I think so. Michael.