From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:36:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87sihgtcme.fsf@engster.org> References: <85a93pj1n5.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <8761ecilmh.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8761ecnsmu.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <87tx1wmc4f.fsf@moondust.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416346623 5320 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2014 21:37:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 18 22:36:58 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqqSG-0004RC-FE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:36:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55514 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqqSG-0005Gw-4J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:36:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42982) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqqRt-00059B-Dz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:36:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqqRo-0000Go-9O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:36:33 -0500 Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([5.45.97.173]:37646) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqqRo-0000GY-4Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:36:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=randomsample.de; s=a; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=5IBYzQxAMum7vXnXI36HZdZwQEQ51B+pXX6TT5zy9BE=; b=d1a0aPgpcSvjTTnriOLFz1IBu3jIXZNX80QX24qDXVtmQGakQZxiMh7ahNk5otsn9S9GUQtT5bcXxnjOY058PywXzMjxZYxoo9ETFXIpoR0sgpOeVASr42TegBMxEiuq; Original-Received: from ip2504b377.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([37.4.179.119] helo=spaten) by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XqqRn-0003h2-FA; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:36:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87tx1wmc4f.fsf@moondust.localdomain> (N. Jackson's message of "Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:29:04 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 5.45.97.173 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177668 Archived-At: N. Jackson writes: > At 17:07 -0400 on Tuesday 2014-11-18, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > >> nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) writes: >> >>> At 11:40 -0400 on Tuesday 2014-11-18, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: >>> >>>> Does anybody know of https sites with interesting types of >>>> un-verifiable certificates so that I can test? Self-signed or expired >>>> certificates would be nice... >>> >>> The Parabola GNU/Linux-libre site at https://www.parabola.nu/ >> >> Looks like a valid certificate? > > Yes, it is. It's only interesting because Firefox, Chrome, and IE are > all reluctant to allow one to view that site because the certificate is > not from a well-known authority. Sounds like nsm correctly allows it. :) CaCert's root CA is present in Debian stable, but was removed in testing. Ubuntu already removed it. -David