Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die

[Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>]

Richard Stallman writes:
> If you send me a list of the current simple markup characters,
> I could make some proposals.

The simple markup is *bold*, =verbatim=, ~code~, /italic/
+strike-through+ and _underline_.  The actual rules are a bit more
complicated since some of that is costumizable for historical reasons.

The last section in the Org syntax document says this:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Text Markup

Text markup follows the pattern:

PRE MARKER CONTENTS MARKER POST

PRE is a whitespace character, (, { ~’~ or a double quote. It can also be a beginning of line.

MARKER is a character among * (bold), = (verbatim), / (italic), + (strike-through), _ (underline), ~ (code).

CONTENTS is a string following the pattern:

BORDER BODY BORDER

BORDER can be any non-whitespace character excepted ~,~, ~’~ or a double quote.

BODY can contain contain any character but may not span over more than 3 lines.

BORDER and BODY are not separated by whitespaces.

CONTENTS can contain any object encountered in a paragraph when markup is “bold”, “italic”, “strike-through” or “underline”.

POST is a whitespace character, -, ., ~,~, :, !, ?, ~’~, ), } or a double quote. It can also be an end of line.

PRE, MARKER, CONTENTS, MARKER and POST are not separated by whitespace characters.

    All of this is wrong if org-emphasis-regexp-components or org-emphasis-alist are modified.

    This should really be simplified and made persistent (i.e. no defcustom allowed). Otherwise, portability and parsing are jokes.

    Also, CONTENTS should be anything within code and verbatim emphasis, by definition. — ngz
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

> I agree that we should not go overboard on this.  It might be good for
> 10 common constructs to have character pairs to designate them, while
> using Texinfo-like format with braces for the rest of the constructs.

I imagine that to look a lot like digraphs and trigraphs...


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra