From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [patch] better(?) indention for cdlatex-environment Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:43:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87sie0vp67.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87386e0zuy.fsf@gmx.us> <87mw4kyq2e.fsf@gmx.us> <87fva9tqdj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <873869h0cd.fsf@gmx.us> <87twypgwt5.fsf@gmx.us> <87pp9cnq9w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874mqoc9zf.fsf@gmx.us> <87lhjzo611.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87wq3hgyie.fsf@gmx.us> <87egpox6o3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <877fvg44nw.fsf@gmx.us> <87mw4cm4sq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r3tmsqbe.fsf@gmx.us> <87vbixa44z.fsf@gmx.us> <87oaop4ha2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r3tla34w.fsf@gmx.us> <87fva14f00.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mw49a047.fsf@gmx.us> <87twyg3n2f.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87zj88vpjm.fsf@gmx.us> <87lhjs3ly4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34540) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YOl3X-00069K-Eo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 05:43:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YOl3T-00031S-Dy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 05:43:35 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:58613) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YOl3T-00031D-2a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 05:43:31 -0500 Received: from x200s ([85.159.237.3]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lm34j-1XpQAd0nqb-00ZesS for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:43:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87lhjs3ly4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:40:35 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Rasmus writes: > >> The think that comes to mind is `show-all'. In my Emacs: >> >> (define-obsolete-function-alias >> 'show-all 'outline-show-all "25.1") > > Ah right. That's the same idea. Functions without a namespace are being > renamed. Good riddance. So when can we target Emacs 24? Jessie? My Debian Squeeze VM has 23.4.1. CentOS 7 is already on Emacs 24.3. =E2=80=94Rasmus --=20 However beautiful the theory, you should occasionally look at the evidence