From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Przemys=C5=82aw_Wojnowski?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Location of tests (again) (was Re: Makefile-help) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:34:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87si4dsif4.fsf@cumego.com> References: <87d1vpoees.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87r3k3igy1.fsf@russet.org.uk> <86io5ewbhg.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <8737wiyt75.fsf_-_@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447187669 7767 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2015 20:34:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Leake , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 10 21:34:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwFcQ-0000Vi-PX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:34:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35432 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwFcQ-0004xO-Oj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:34:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwFcM-0004v7-Tn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:34:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwFcH-0000YS-Uo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:34:14 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp23.iq.pl ([86.111.242.228]:49861) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwFcH-0000YF-Lp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:34:09 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 23739 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2015 20:34:08 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO namek.cumego.com) (esperanto@cumego.com@[159.205.193.173]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp22.iq.pl with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP for ; 10 Nov 2015 20:34:08 -0000 In-Reply-To: <8737wiyt75.fsf_-_@russet.org.uk> (Phillip Lord's message of "Sat, 07 Nov 2015 10:55:42 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 86.111.242.228 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193964 Archived-At: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) writes: > test/automated/lisp > test/automated/lisp/emacs-lisp > test/automated/lisp/progmodes (and so on....) > test/automated/lisp/c (lisp tests for the C core) > test/automated/lisp/legacy (ones which don't fit, to be fixed) > test/automated/src (empty but reserved for C tests of C core) Sorry to comment on this so late, but it wouldn't it make sense to move automated tests to directly under "test/" ? "automated/" here looks a bit artificial to me. Sooner or later all tests will be automated anyway.