From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] master 88578a4: Increase the default number of hits Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 22:01:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87si2oq5z2.fsf@gnus.org> References: <20151224213932.12107.84317@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87wps1ghyu.fsf@gnus.org> <0xd1ttrmgp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451163754 19641 80.91.229.3 (26 Dec 2015 21:02:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 21:02:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Albinus , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 26 22:02:24 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aCvyp-0001tO-T0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 22:02:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39842 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCvyp-0004xQ-8o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 16:02:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41062) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCvyl-0004x5-ER for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 16:02:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCvyi-0006iw-66 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 16:02:19 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:56227) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCvyh-0006i3-V4; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 16:02:16 -0500 Original-Received: from 2.150.58.24.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.58.24] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aCvyM-00053X-G0; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 22:01:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <0xd1ttrmgp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:20:22 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aCvyM-00053X-G0 MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1451768514.9374@dFFOsVCsx6pTcBr97FELJQ X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196937 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > Because the more results you fetch at once, the more memory it uses on > the server, thus increasing the likelihood of a bunch of simultaneous > requests causing an out-of-memory condition. I did already explain this, > not sure why it's hard to get across. It hard to get across because it's just so odd. :-) Since this is an obviously useful functionality that would make Emacs bug triage easier, why can't we have the VM where this is running provisioned with more RAM? I can send money to the FSF for 32GB extra RAM if that helps. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no