Re: Help setting nadvice for indent-region

[Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se>]

John Mastro <john.b.mastro@gmail.com> writes:

> My preference is for something a bit simpler, which
> avoids the use of macros. Macros can be awesome, but
> IMO they don't contribute much here.

Macros and advices are absolutely at the next level
compared to stapling defuns as another bricklayer, but
just because it is more advanced doesn't make it
better - it depends.

> (defvar modi/region-or-whole-fns '(indent-region eval-region))
>
> (defun modi/region-or-whole-advice (orig &rest _)
>   (interactive)
>   (if (use-region-p)
>       (funcall orig (region-beginning) (region-end))
>     (funcall orig (point-min) (point-max))))
>
> (dolist (fn modi/region-or-whole-fns)
>   (advice-add fn :around #'modi/region-or-whole-advice))

OK, if this is "simpler", I'd say my DWIM groyne is
simpler still:

    (defun indent-region-dwim ()
      (interactive)
      (if mark-active
          (indent-region (mark) (point))
        (indent-region (point-min) (point-max) )))

It it also more natural and "human-ish" to read
without all the computer lingo (`funcall' etc.).

Anyway, another interesting difference, where I'm not
sure what is the best way, is

    `mark-active', then (mark) and (point)

vs.

    (use-region-p), then (region-beginning) and (region-help)

What does "the book" say on this?

-- 
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573