From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dominik Schrempf Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24091: 24.5; High CPU usage at startup while hidden Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:19:52 +0100 Message-ID: <87shons1mf.fsf@gmail.com> References: <24533f31-9fc2-b38e-aaeb-561616cdf77f@gmail.com> <87shut9pyk.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83lh0lq9n5.fsf@gnu.org> <83oa5fp1zb.fsf@gnu.org> <877fbkw7b1.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83inv1fnf9.fsf@gnu.org> <83zinodghv.fsf@gnu.org> <83y438de6m.fsf@gnu.org> <57CBCE4F.5040705@gmx.at> <57CC1E5F.8010107@gmx.at> <57CC4435.7040503@gmx.at> <838tv5au9g.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1484302892 31089 195.159.176.226 (13 Jan 2017 10:21:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:21:32 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: Noam Postavsky , acairncross@gmail.com, clement.pit@gmail.com, 24091@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 13 11:21:28 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRyyt-0006Of-FU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:21:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40224 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRyyx-0005ze-SQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 05:21:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36559) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRyyn-0005zZ-Pw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 05:21:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRyyk-00043R-6e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 05:21:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36699) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRyyk-00043B-3w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 05:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRyyj-0005UW-TK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 05:21:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dominik Schrempf Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24091 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 24091-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24091.148430280920999 (code B ref 24091); Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24091) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2017 10:20:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52098 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRyxq-0005SX-0N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 05:20:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:33338) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRyxl-0005Rn-9b for 24091@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 05:20:04 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id n129so10911975wmn.0 for <24091@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 02:20:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZGmyevHqWfyMF91jLcq1usIG/+U+/HlzkenknnpS2d4=; b=mT6ai3oNrO3NhZ+JAWt96rd9VO2wF930H13ZURSGihhOC1si5QOV6gi7e25m3WHv8W aG6kJKQLLpQd0f2wb0nNrHNX1xE8pIaCIke9s7I+I88vLeBd2U6I1dvUjB5aq1WWhD0C u3PYLT2pS9gv2xoWYChLfhHViLT0oOKCz93Q0Kw4ZvjzE+P81BpjJ87u9a0bou4o1wAd 6KdF/OYtNWfX5A+028JrscHBJsNFFrsTmFQDVR6HqKtLBGqC0KhU1BfLGYPeKO7xfL6o 7BJKrBjUaRgpkkhm8+Gw+SzFUl5/yoe6NOhxzuL90tmMINsdXj5bGI4kP4lJ7f+HhaNa lhvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZGmyevHqWfyMF91jLcq1usIG/+U+/HlzkenknnpS2d4=; b=nM+aSAcpz58f5X9SD09lPJm2yhZZbKdovid6Qy8oIyDYEqTApJVVuwvMr2OVnllEX1 opJLNzQ+b/TtpYGdXsvs36d0nla1/gcrdEEf9UQsfUBndFrcsWvslbf+vVZCNw9gUX/U SBXZrRMWLPSKeWfrsT4uoHWDi2E/ZTOaFk9Dy6A5mkulVDv66Dm2oubw0lyWLkxyhpfT Jj1BJf2zQj1HA+A7cW3yDiEQz37PcZsFLBlHZyYB9qy9RKFOp1IjWLAocIyzMMmekZ+g lna+giFMBhlW2uHi2NaLx28mMbWzWpXkcHYuw+UcVEIurZE6GFSzAkG8RKxKKdqikn5K xfGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK/xk8b8mXFLtrfbHmdW5y6sed+lD3JnwmtG2FYVDp/B+qaSpNg86zu8LmQPm1owg== X-Received: by 10.223.131.193 with SMTP id 59mr11228677wre.186.1484302795520; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 02:19:55 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (i122mc151.vu-wien.ac.at. [193.171.97.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y145sm3244954wmc.17.2017.01.13.02.19.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 Jan 2017 02:19:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <838tv5au9g.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 06 Sep 2016 19:05:31 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:128061 Archived-At: Hello, I do not want to bring up old threads, but I am having the exact same problem with Emacs+XMonad for years now. Did you come to a conclusion or find a fix back in September? Thanks, Dominik On Tue, Sep 06 2016, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Noam Postavsky >> Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 12:21:20 -0400 >> Cc: Aiken , >> Cl=C3=A9ment Pit--Claudel , >> 24091@debbugs.gnu.org >>=20 >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 11:56 AM, martin rudalics wrote: >> > In x_make_frame_visible we have this loop: >> > >> > while (!FRAME_VISIBLE_P (f)) >> > >> > What I wanted to know is whether the frame f here is the _same_ frame >> > you see in x_top_window_to_frame where IIUC >> > >> > if (wdesc =3D=3D XtWindow (x->widget)) >> > return f; >>=20 >> Oh, I see. Yes, it is the same frame. > > Maybe we should stop waiting after some time has passed, like 0.5 > sec. Does that work in this case? Does the frame always appears > within half a second when workspaces are not involved? > > Thanks.