From: Alex <agrambot@gmail.com>
To: Gemini Lasswell <gazally@runbox.com>
Cc: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net,
Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>,
24402@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#24402: should-error doesn't catch all errors
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:40:03 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87shhsuk3g.fsf@lylat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87eftcglz3.fsf@runbox.com> (Gemini Lasswell's message of "Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:23:12 -0700")
Gemini Lasswell <gazally@runbox.com> writes:
> Hello,
>
> First, thank you for working on this bug!
>
> I have a branch of Emacs which attempts to run all the tests under
> Testcover, and I've tried it with Alex's latest patch. The patch has
> fixed the problems with Testcover and should-error except for one weird
> case. Here is a file that will let you reproduce the weird case on
> master with the patch applied:
>
>
>
> This is an excerpt of test/src/fns-tests.el with a few lines added at
> the end to invoke Testcover. It contains two nearly identical tests
> which should both pass, but one passes and one fails. If you then edit
> the file and comment out test-cycle-assoc (the one that passes) and run
> the test again, then the failing test will pass. I've reproduced it both
> in batch mode (without TEST_LOAD_EL=no) and interactively.
Hmm, this isn't the behaviour that I see. I get the following errors
both with and without my patch, and both interactively and in batch
mode:
===============================================================================================
Edebug: cyc1
Edebug: test@test-cycle-assq
Edebug: test@test-cycle-assoc
Edebug: cyc1
Edebug: test@test-cycle-assq
Edebug: test@test-cycle-assoc
...
Edebug: cyc1
Edebug: test@test-cycle-assq
Compiler-macro error for cl--block-wrapper: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds ‘max-lisp-eval-depth’")
Edebug: test@test-cycle-assoc
Compiler-macro error for cl--block-wrapper: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds ‘max-lisp-eval-depth’")
Edebug: cyc1
Edebug: test@test-cycle-assq
Compiler-macro error for cl--block-wrapper: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds ‘max-lisp-eval-depth’")
Eager macro-expansion failure: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds ‘max-lisp-eval-depth’")
Compiler-macro error for cl--block-wrapper: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds ‘max-lisp-eval-depth’")
Eager macro-expansion failure: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds ‘max-lisp-eval-depth’")
Compiler-macro error for cl--block-wrapper: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds ‘max-lisp-eval-depth’")
Entering debugger...
cl--generic-make-next-function: Symbol’s function definition is void: t
===============================================================================================
The ... above represents Edebug cycling, for some reason, between the 3
functions.
Noam, can you reproduce this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-19 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-10 1:26 bug#24402: 25.1.50; testcover-start breaks should-error Gemini Lasswell
[not found] ` <handler.24402.B.14734739098199.ack@debbugs.gnu.org>
2016-09-20 4:27 ` bug#24402: More Information Gemini Lasswell
2017-07-04 3:28 ` bug#24402: should-error doesn't catch all errors (Was:bug#24402: More Information) Alex
2017-07-05 0:00 ` bug#24402: should-error doesn't catch all errors Alex
2017-07-05 13:43 ` Tino Calancha
2017-07-05 19:56 ` Alex
2017-07-07 10:15 ` Tino Calancha
2017-07-09 7:04 ` Alex
2017-07-11 12:18 ` npostavs
2017-07-12 3:47 ` Alex
2017-07-12 12:30 ` npostavs
2017-07-12 16:45 ` Alex
2017-07-13 1:31 ` npostavs
2017-07-13 3:04 ` Alex
2017-07-13 3:44 ` npostavs
2017-07-13 22:45 ` Alex
2017-07-13 23:49 ` npostavs
2017-07-14 4:42 ` Alex
2017-07-14 4:45 ` Alex
2017-07-15 21:57 ` npostavs
2017-07-16 3:49 ` Alex
2017-07-17 0:46 ` npostavs
2017-07-19 21:23 ` Gemini Lasswell
2017-07-19 22:40 ` Alex [this message]
2017-07-19 23:04 ` npostavs
2017-07-20 4:04 ` Alex
2017-07-20 19:23 ` Gemini Lasswell
2017-08-08 1:15 ` npostavs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87shhsuk3g.fsf@lylat \
--to=agrambot@gmail.com \
--cc=24402@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=gazally@runbox.com \
--cc=npostavs@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tino.calancha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.