From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31549: 25.3; bytecompile fails with eval-when-compile Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 19:33:03 -0400 Message-ID: <87sh6jgtao.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8636yknjy1.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1527031927 7159 195.159.176.226 (22 May 2018 23:32:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 23:32:07 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 31549@debbugs.gnu.org To: ynyaaa@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 23 01:32:02 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fLGl8-0001k5-Dk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 01:32:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58394 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLGnF-0001Kn-BP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 19:34:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58872) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLGn9-0001Kg-44 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 19:34:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLGn4-0006Eb-7p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 19:34:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36678) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLGn4-0006EU-3r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 19:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fLGn3-00083m-Qk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 19:34:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 23:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31549 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31549-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31549.152703199330927 (code B ref 31549); Tue, 22 May 2018 23:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31549) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 May 2018 23:33:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44575 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fLGmH-00082l-Ah for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 19:33:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f177.google.com ([209.85.223.177]:37316) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fLGmF-00082X-2D for 31549@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 19:33:11 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f177.google.com with SMTP id e20-v6so20582397iof.4 for <31549@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 22 May 2018 16:33:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=uajjzA97kTFOtvCHUAAyHfGY/5domfVutEiYmDISVwk=; b=K49DoesL/avrC6apsl8uHUC0WQxJM53wlOzCs1CHOLntHotC6K9fjnd2/C/PYBMM2V hZx3Vjm3fCJ4lU/AqyoNVKtbB6FvErujZ4CVe9P1Erh6MDVrAKJWhpWHmP2MoSUR+Czu Jdrcwtyksl5PdZK7IFNS/pFZ5DOStlEXnESZUZpt9O7624HpWJWp9l2W/8UvlAcisF1/ 5fHQz5yZt9QFYRYBa/EYecIf9jgbYaI14xCSqIf+jAXZbdbuya0Jis0VnvLTV2mt5XHh RPewKGidjbB2mWlsoUV1rN/svn0g4oZD7WcN5dzvd8vY3dSBU8OxG5FSMVnnEHNES0vM gJug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=uajjzA97kTFOtvCHUAAyHfGY/5domfVutEiYmDISVwk=; b=dWym7fFMUjvWZJe92zfA5TkFbdL6KyG+k11GU9U6i9PNaTFtn4ivslPMMHQjLN1SSN +/TYETImOlYaVpN/fSG1Bl4Q3JD2XYNJrSzDX0hdt4fbJfAF7XqbdruF8x6JbZfA63Q/ UzfDkqbdIZwtQjS2JPi+VUC5867Wk+xGIqbIHvr3xiozCkH3FQaKGebJSc1VSa9u+Y0p 917AURYM6087mSARB+Vj7zl2wAmhOnLQJ3bres67k9dml26Qbgrs/D6+A+cpZJQhfMg8 eWPUBh4v5DKjQvl0y6ZLw8hiN3DQ8Dw3mWMjcKctwdCsUVSq8k5/gcfmkdt5YpfnNzjO Kfwg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcWfWiOrFiMbN7x66KFVhpcV85hn6gdkJg09CRNuSPjrwg6c9XF PD9A0VTiCs8ZRw2eS2eTlY60wg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqzD95P+I7rPqKD26xfBEi4ZWjF0OmgdFFxO1IqhLS7VfTm8C5nxtlXxWrGqA5SI4UibPcPjA== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:1e8f:: with SMTP id e137-v6mr482402ioe.192.1527031985341; Tue, 22 May 2018 16:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q21-v6sm5016049itb.4.2018.05.22.16.33.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 22 May 2018 16:33:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8636yknjy1.fsf@gmail.com> (ynyaaa's message of "Tue, 22 May 2018 18:00:54 +0900") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:146407 Archived-At: ynyaaa@gmail.com writes: > (byte-compile `(eval-when-compile (list ,@(make-list 2047 0)))) > > Evaluating the form above, emacs (with -Q option) reports > Error: Memory exhausted--use C-x s then exit and restart Emacs > in *Compile-Log* buffer. > The returned value of the form is t. The error is coming from exec_byte_code: if (MAX_ALLOCA / word_size <= XFASTINT (maxdepth)) memory_full (SIZE_MAX); It's more like a Lisp stack overflow than a memory exhausted situation though, hardly calls for restarting Emacs. Perhaps the byte compiler should refuse to compile such a large expression? I can't reproduce in Emacs 26, but only because MAX_ALLOCA is bigger, I think.