From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2018 12:07:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87sh3tunx4.fsf@gmx.de> References: <8736wa9c5s.fsf@gmx.de> <87wotkn6do.fsf@gmx.de> > <874lgn8x6l.fsf@gmx.de> > <87sh44pisz.fsf@gmx.de> <87a7qbitc7.fsf@gmx.de>> <878t5tdsfc.fsf@gmx.de>> <83wotcpzub.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmaiuwml.fsf@gmx.de> <877el6uwio.fsf@gmx.de>> <7c28f9d8-e2bb-4778-ab92-92707f12718f@default>> <837el6t8r3.fsf@gnu.org>> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1533463587 24383 195.159.176.226 (5 Aug 2018 10:06:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 10:06:27 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, fgunbin@fastmail.fm, Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 05 12:06:23 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fmFva-0006De-W5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2018 12:06:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57831 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fmFxf-0002wO-HE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2018 06:08:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fmFwz-0002w7-Rd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2018 06:07:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fmFwy-0000ZA-VZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2018 06:07:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:37471) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fmFwu-0000YX-BO; Sun, 05 Aug 2018 06:07:44 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.86.52.225]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LcT2M-1gAtqg1LxG-00jorL; Sun, 05 Aug 2018 12:07:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 04 Aug 2018 21:59:25 -0400") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:mgvMouMrVENhsZldK9SR6uas7Ox8QRvPeTr+GnRmNfvo7UbuwcU F6bgr2NB70G5pOEHi5g92dMt1WvXglCF2HHMaAPOeKZIWUAh8zcf8CB6/DX13qJhMh0/M4L lqunI9NLvQ4JxWeyKu5OmLlE4NFVFWEIohN3yZKke7uXqmQmulIofuHbhic7e5N6oCs2pJh i556fB0dp6J7HMvtj49JA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:RXkjEHZ9l4w=:s1uKdYv6ZA48EymqB5IHiu l1fi1dHPM0QJFDqgOk6Uo2GKmvJBFdyaiDjW/A6hN7eLwthAif5spDD9TcxQQDid0JVYnLgZJ 81Fnn9jTfsi3sIXtgLWixKnRhM25YdbTaqwjL6TWQ4bhq6vQjnDpRuaDQFHxwHHt5i/aYfH42 39xNuH0a+OjLO//Yw8h0QTC9SpVE0V/7aTO51n7AEn5YKvIZj/jgDey7FZfnc0cFC7rSZYqkL JvMJApPK6cLthEqvhtdTVEVM7BQizuyyRbpSdxVfMi3pJMl4OiaqQLrAMOsMJHRtShBo8AiQQ S8VrLW0K7LR8lsVN/Wj3/wVa4HgZncNIeyCAKYTLHUkgEMzfSBDx2OTr+8aN8q0xTuD0bStpY eclMtZ28Zn2sfFc+DWcuOWkr0a54TPgkr8mk/vOYFluVHXrZlOe3w20JV7DT0YZSsjFuQV6CD 9P+1LDSznnauE+1KtS0vIu2FwDefCvC6Bh7f9glEMadqQmMkQvfyQICMgYZNkChjqBB33Zj36 V/Yj9AI/S+N2QgcVt6zgVMZl9Xdd8ukIYNLRFBphmuVB2hmdgGfgxatJmuNw4dRJY5VfzcrUc ukopXcgS1p6eax1bbJsSvD/dDTFDyHKJBRtBoQrZe+PrHtv7Y91EepcLygnOdgNogMuHhLOek VDQWEbkz7Sd+BkzmnSaTrGUzU2fYahDUym0CgiTh8kbrP6v+tc1Zvcie66C1tTrMJdlFYDmZ8 fi6oB25uOL+bacHKgWOivvgCBJxiHF2RPTbKy4wvfikakNhl6bP1d7Oxgs9uOJOIn6xd4XXP X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228185 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > However, I agree it is clearest NOT to think of C-x RET c > as a prefix argument. The prefix argument is a specific kind of value > and that is not how C-x RET c works. How would you name "C-x RET c" or "C-x &" then? I don't know of a term which describes that behavior. For the time being I use "key sequence C-x & prior the interactive command invocation", but this is more a description than a clear term. Best regards, Michael.