From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28202: 26.0.50; Loading package.el should not start a subprocess Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 08:28:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87sgqtpaw2.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: <87y30zbj0z.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="102369"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 28202@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philipp Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 26 08:29:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hqtj5-000QWY-FV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 08:29:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36466 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqtj2-0003eE-SX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 02:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48933) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqtiy-0003e7-O2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 02:29:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqtiw-0002UF-Kg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 02:29:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60143) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqtiw-0002TR-FU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 02:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqtiw-0004bY-Ag for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 02:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 06:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28202 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 28202-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28202.156412253317686 (code B ref 28202); Fri, 26 Jul 2019 06:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28202) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jul 2019 06:28:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40730 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqtin-0004bB-G5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 02:28:53 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:56090) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqtil-0004b2-LH for 28202@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 02:28:52 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hqtif-0003jf-Of; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 08:28:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y30zbj0z.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 15 Jul 2019 14:05:00 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:163748 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > This does mean though, that if you don't have gpg installed, the > `package-check-signature' value will still be `allow-signature', but > it'll act as if it's nil. Currently, it would default to nil, and that > may be confusing. > > Perhaps I could change the default to 'check-available or something and > then actually set the variable if it is that? Opinions? There weren't any, so I've applied a tweaked version of this to the trunk, including a NEWS item that calls out this change. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no