From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15682: 24.3.50; `:link' in `defgroup' does not respect `mouse-1-click-follows-link' Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 12:50:59 -0400 Message-ID: <87sgppmbnw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8736hpajah.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="224359"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: 15682@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen , Mauro Aranda To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 25 18:52:18 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i1vkX-000wFd-Uc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 18:52:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43950 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i1vkW-0002X6-6E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 12:52:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37487) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i1vkJ-0002Wx-An for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 12:52:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i1vkI-0008MN-6l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 12:52:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36214) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i1vkI-0008M8-0Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 12:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1vkH-0004Aj-SC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 12:52:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 16:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15682 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 15682-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15682.156675187015965 (code B ref 15682); Sun, 25 Aug 2019 16:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15682) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2019 16:51:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45035 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1vjS-00049R-Fb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 12:51:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io1-f41.google.com ([209.85.166.41]:38349) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1vjP-00049A-4O for 15682@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 12:51:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io1-f41.google.com with SMTP id p12so31716727iog.5 for <15682@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 09:51:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=q2kI9c0oWDDeKAyDPg/xkB6NfBJLLMdHgPYJTDBCZzo=; b=c1e2YbHtPCpmokXViEQ6milsmVvlwgFO4TaDRCDZZVCmCCq4JyE5pa4llk0zEfHmBI BQojVYA6fcESS994wjOaeGNNnpNyS+iLFIRp6z6hCYRrFFkuWm22RA2A+gGMBo3eOnQY A6uevYqSA8Ts61L7WXaPXJsN/emL2BGinbU3+bz+IJV+I9aQPgAamdzsOrusHN5rHODO yRPWKASPaj5CgL4hO+rmHc2BvYkISA5dJv1LYDoiV93Q/gk+XKE1wSeRbbfGCXo0OZR9 lJlL6eoTRdn6TYwf9df81BYKzS3rrMdIFjERLvLVWj2yIR1z8ScaNAZaDUR5qXB2fwce 78uQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=q2kI9c0oWDDeKAyDPg/xkB6NfBJLLMdHgPYJTDBCZzo=; b=Mq8l0i/kgzq2LjchyXCwVzvGBe2IHAQ/rHBJsPwalWpE2HEGpQJWy3vZEaJH6daVGy 1cqYynFsIqU8X8yZv2sdMIeMGWJujf5lCY5p/IzxhjHs8zSHLrQwX7jeSYuqRAIrSu79 PSUOrxwIkbNei1wNRrXfAZXy9F4GoH8uLAszL3cxC1xCAbKY8CJr5EeqVsaotfanxyxY SyJI92K5bvTJnrAbzDADKTmpjqxgqYNOblZ8W7p3HIsPg5YZ3THSAgzOxnWfV78V2V0y /xKkWJGtywYY3YDYVg3LvpBzLsbsQd5nvMyqAeGxxZ2ewJMZqb2kQs5Wbv9KWj6qec90 kiWg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWdV0fZ31wTgD8CEaIEbuOvnBOoBScqTpBaCEDmSiz+kHS0H0tR ERsBjO/Wi+k+soCXwHwqSTn9OBcV X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxuEL6bV1k2Dr54krOUdcI62sJQBU6OCG9yPVaZZIVVde4WCnT0tW0tkqFvYDeHfGR2YJTrqg== X-Received: by 2002:a02:5ec9:: with SMTP id h192mr9317555jab.25.1566751861323; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 09:51:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k24sm6832368ioj.39.2019.08.25.09.51.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 25 Aug 2019 09:51:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 25 Aug 2019 09:22:54 -0700 (PDT)") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:165844 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: >> What happened to the bug # in the Subject line? >> Please restore it. > > Hm. I see it got restored by my reply. > Why was it missing from Mauro's and Lars's > mails? E.g.: I guess Mauro just copied the subject from https://debbugs.gnu.org/15682#5, which doesn't include the bug number (because it shows mail as it was originally sent, before the bug number was assigned). When someone sends a message without the bug number to a nnnnn@debbugs.gnu.org address, the bug list mail server adds the bug number back; but if you're on Cc, then you'll get the message directly from the sender (i.e., not from the server, and so you won't see the number added back in. I think you would *also* get the message from the server with the bug number, but depending on your mail setup, it might get hidden/deleted as a duplicate).