tags 6679 + patch
thanks

On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:14:09 -0600
Kevin Rodgers wrote:

> Assuming that complexity is justified, it ought to be factored into a
> read-library-name utility that both find-library and locate-library use.

The first part has since happened (`read-library-name'), all that is
needed is the latter. Patch attached.

> `C-h a -library\'' returns apropos-library and load-library in addition to
> find-library and locate-library, but it's not clear to me that they would
> benefit from a default.

The patch also handles `load-library'. The set of arguments/completions
expected/provided by `apropos-library' is slightly different and
requires other validation, so `read-library-name' wouldn't really help
there.

-- 
Štěpán