From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master b8062be 3/5: Remove some compat code from eudc-bob.el Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 11:53:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87sgco1bhq.fsf@gnus.org> References: <20200812175454.4839.92908@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200812175456.C5D122172E@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <874kp7lpda.fsf@gnus.org> <87mu2zhssl.fsf@gnus.org> <83imdmn0vr.fsf@gnu.org> <835z9mmy4t.fsf@gnu.org> <83364qmr7f.fsf@gnu.org> <83zh6yl7wr.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2mil619.fsf@gnu.org> <83tux5lq43.fsf@gnu.org> <87bljdblir.fsf@gnus.org> <83mu2xldkh.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0y1lca6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="748"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 15 18:01:17 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k6ycP-000060-QY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 18:01:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54020 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6ycO-0007MF-JE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 12:01:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6yZT-0004Ej-Lm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 11:58:15 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:45014) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6yZR-0000y7-A1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 11:58:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nI9zRwFXgnBckVjRNXHgO9wK6tKyTMgZRejFbWpk2K8=; b=u0guSn+wJyhfi8xkzjKzKa9zlK cAPgFENAVlzGmW5jBHsXc8C31qLDHCEXI8Phvzn+fELyriwQhlbxCVvYPeojehfYeG3x96menrvTk qMxRo47INGOTpFrpdM5HK1llUGamWxZQWnBuyEQnEiOwEiZzzmBRk5NlkMEDroL9EU8c=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k6ssM-0006Ir-IW; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 11:53:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83k0y1lca6.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 14 Aug 2020 14:03:45 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253804 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > Yeah, setting buffer-file-coding-system here is nonsensical, I think? >> > buffer-file-coding-system is something you set if you have characters in >> > the buffer, but a unibyte buffer contains only bytes, so no coding system >> > conversion will be done when saving the buffer, I'd always assumed? >> >> Precisely. > > Well, modulo the EOL conversion, as discussed. Oh, so then it is needed... which is unfortunate. But that explains all that (let ((coding-system-for-write 'binary)) ...) code all over Emacs. :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no