From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:25:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87sg6cruy1.fsf@gnus.org> References: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo.ref@Ergus> <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus> <87h7mt3qjo.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87im78usd9.fsf@gnus.org> <878s84url8.fsf@gnus.org> <878s84ta7n.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14185"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Richard Stallman , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 04 11:38:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7c1p-0003bQ-Ns for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:38:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55018 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7c1o-0004Cp-PV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 05:38:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59282) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7bpU-0000Tp-Av for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 05:25:40 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:45310) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7bpN-0003V1-2B; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 05:25:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5BVSbrR+oxnwCRkFercsmEhujAB+cnlhqt5kaYt8eh4=; b=LgFTJeIDA3taYFMZa+VYu1I/fW ZVBaDaXlvFCpM7G7bUFt/c3wjG9BJKcEp3LW09hs/ipWZgsLpYkD1+37c0OLuey3UZNgK0Qw+oN35 qdOGKfFQb6ulQhgJJ3iZQ2PoZvGU/Xe+Q3FN//22++hy2UopcrdlXLtJVXFcXj2N3K5Q=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7bpH-0005jV-Ru; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:25:31 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAG1BMVEUODQ0qKCdDPztU VFSgoKDPzs75+fmAf4D///+57VllAAAAAWJLR0QIht6VegAAAAd0SU1FB+UCBAoJFld+b2gAAAGX SURBVDjLvZNNU8IwEIbTpuA1gMMZ6MA5nUDPiNqzKPSsQNcr46H+fXeTTZo66tGd6ZDl6X7k3a0Q o8jGC7ZcC7TRN5uYeT4T3pI+C0D1UQcwn0KkPJjz35NHgOZ+RoE9cAtwPNbQ6MRFK051A5cCa+R1 o7miA2n94vy0uvjUFpTeFbLeR0CCDr1lTQTKs+isegogiQIw5BJA9o6HeSC19qDE4JTLr5V1Hajx kQQSRefszCClPiSlW8ER2Cdg37BgCQCcQeA8Bm8eiBIARSy1A1MqJs8MsLvV1oHyGkCL0gsxfGKg O3B4OAiXG0HbgcrerQdocuipGJSxUn+DVwdsd7FNuSvqLo9ByffITqyCncaWezMzq4aTmt7G/CAc EKiPn7REEe0ELGhRk+rZghbvOaRuEwIDLJLBDr0NTb+6eiApzwYaXNE79hAUJBH1t8bN/aDyJ+Ej eGPwE+iWLzH2p9p3t3PLxyALK7eEWQxwpoVbKyofg6SFg1mYCvhzCICugNbsfKnUFP44Np9GiR9A 3/4DyN+B/gJE3FfUnIXTXAAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMS0wMi0wNFQxMDowOToyMisw MDowMA+RlKwAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEtMDItMDRUMTA6MDk6MjIrMDA6MDB+zCwQ AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Nathan Fake's _#savefabric (6)_: "Laluna" In-Reply-To: (Gregory Heytings's message of "Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:20:32 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263865 Archived-At: Gregory Heytings writes: > I misunderstood what you said indeed. I think asking before doing > anything would be okay, but I guess in that case it would be necessary > to introduce an "undo-outer-outer-limit" at, say, 250 MB, above which > it would not be possible to keep the undo info. Ideally, we could ask "this action will take MB; really do it?", and we won't need any new variable. But like I said, I don't know how feasible this is to ask before the doing the action. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no