From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tim Cross Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Grammar checking in Emacs Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 09:49:07 +1100 Message-ID: <87sfvvd6tk.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87k0h82v4k.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16002"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.7.5; emacs 28.0.60 To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 17 00:23:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mn7nR-0003tK-6D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 00:23:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58040 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mn7nQ-0001Sg-2I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 18:23:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59312) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mn7mh-0000mh-Aw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 18:22:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::535] (port=37588 helo=mail-pg1-x535.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mn7mf-0007Rq-8e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 18:22:39 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id s138so528038pgs.4 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:22:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=references:user-agent:from:to:subject:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version; bh=CeNx021msZjckfMXbn9Zl2RA25zkHY1SegEtRx855mo=; b=NB5Y6DjaJU0nipsCTCUkYiWrbUioclF05jDFRMae8icjT5MkSy9BRKENPFVUKMp9sx X2keZplS1RehUA72zJjc7/FqBA6bTUFw+2GD42z0V9yXMeHyEwEzNd4MUZDIwoYWgjAr 4Mml3eGy44jk/fBEeRj9ZTnf0ChFo8uDOS7iD/WaHeREh1hPw2CoGemEiIo6OoiyfKqU KyLuqPuX1d59jT5FUJhgLcgm1YSMXNlsZ0AMlg5VA+O0mKSOROM9TJJxHyHdMKuIhCqd OBwZ9k5YIWuvqC36Lj/9JWpEQselFJWXJawhhfwrds1kZpzYLGj/WF8aT1NqzWzkbDH4 FtbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:subject:date :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=CeNx021msZjckfMXbn9Zl2RA25zkHY1SegEtRx855mo=; b=QXeckp4cNpqPDSMlAxbQ2Sf8fiSXVVqFbBwt8WoBBko7DAYXL5f9+Ul6Nolqffp28i jQrh9M0SaLDmvD953wYgDRQF8d3wh18vy2u4sfaJT4mkJQ3NQixg1B0CF9cyn4thEKfz 27wYOgIYmJHNIc3JXFEHPCldO53ObJ6IwsqqFkngbmNbTbQlwNUvtpJa/YXv4aMb5aV9 ouewXICZDCJ7+l6Q9V4VzFhAMVTwJN1OXbW9sPtMXagKgKH9GVmVHCnuWnHY63/8FLS1 uXmNwAEHCNejaBuK2eBoBDI7Gma8OAtS+T1azsLmJ7gCQbJugyKb4yZo1voLe0+2k+09 mGDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533GT18/aXmnZF9tg3vKA99ZPK7/8Tm8GiL9vGEjKIYvp3YhC94n HszUIUijmiFzFo0HYE+4VmokYrxdR0A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxmWnGuYY4k6und0Ggs8zpJ3RlK0Co16FWIfAwkB+RJT4PamjC+ZRky99nV71igvXyUrdtnUQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:140e:b0:444:b077:51ef with SMTP id l14-20020a056a00140e00b00444b07751efmr2819509pfu.61.1637104954758; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:22:34 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from dingbat (2001-44b8-31f2-bb00-8cbc-c5cf-71b9-3fa1.static.ipv6.internode.on.net. [2001:44b8:31f2:bb00:8cbc:c5cf:71b9:3fa1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p43sm9403568pfw.4.2021.11.16.15.22.33 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:22:34 -0800 (PST) In-reply-to: X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::535 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::535; envelope-from=theophilusx@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-x535.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279585 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > In my view, this is not a problem of software freedom, so I do consider > LanguageTool to be philosophically perfectly acceptable. > It's just technically rather annoying to install :-( > [ Installing a JAR file is no solution, since you then have to worry > about keeping it up-to-date. ] > Just interested in why you find installing a jar file so problematic. Given it is essentially just a zip archive, how is installing a jar file and keeping it up-to-date any different from installing any binary package? Even when you clone a repository and build from sources, you still have to pull updates and rebuild. Is their something fundamentally different with jar or is it simply a different build system and the discomfort is due to it being less familiar?