From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Po Lu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: help needed for getting a backtrace ( multi-head emacs_abort on lucid-frame) Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 08:53:57 +0800 Message-ID: <87sfq9hp0a.fsf@yahoo.com> References: <86mtgjh13r.fsf@gmail.com> <877d7nmfbm.fsf@yahoo.com> <87y203np3y.fsf@manco.pe> <87v8v7kv9h.fsf@yahoo.com> <86mtgjgiaj.fsf@gmail.com> <87ilr7kmkh.fsf@yahoo.com> <86lew3gd98.fsf@gmail.com> <87zgkjj5ox.fsf@yahoo.com> <86h76qhq5g.fsf@gmail.com> <87lew2khks.fsf@yahoo.com> <86fsmahmfk.fsf@gmail.com> <87v8v6izxm.fsf@yahoo.com> <86ee1uhkp6.fsf@gmail.com> <87fsmaiycx.fsf@yahoo.com> <86czhehj2n.fsf@gmail.com> <877d7miwwz.fsf@yahoo.com> <86a6cihh3t.fsf@gmail.com> <87y202hegz.fsf@yahoo.com> <868rs2h4u6.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18275"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?andr=C3=A9s_ram=C3=ADrez?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 19 02:55:19 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ngc9G-0004ZH-JZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 02:55:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40872 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ngc9F-0005w3-E8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 20:55:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ngc8I-0005GX-7D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 20:54:18 -0400 Original-Received: from sonic307-10.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.190.33]:33038) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ngc8F-0004E5-ST for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 20:54:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1650329652; bh=0K7DH+J72jp89ACN5chkhqItURWY9ytABdQGguMwpPE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=qo/BylWWgMGaeX4BMJNCkcehWIq3NRi3Hq8ymf8EJ+vOxL1suasyeRrOkO+2AEsRz73tBRpE3AzLB0NXQ1hw5Y6N2d/z1HgPu5de5PHFH2tGVMdRIT5NXyARPiu4qaUNlmvw4mUB6nwTKeRitrGgpQfqL53BU6lAuZrX1Wq75rxx5OdLYSG9dpq/f329qFTJynPR3Wkl6VGb+WWvla2ozY0ttlfIm0oiC1hPP3HzhIs3Al8dJpYVJgLse8st6pNRG8dkt45S2PJtaYl9IBHSeT3jCPdiKaKhSMZFc43oV71OPPL8lSJwhCHxxvBtZU7Y/cYOwvxiJUYPI4fsKfaFQg== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1650329652; bh=mer5UpoS8tavaIn0jmGK9lcBKYb+PQ4z2Qb6Pt+xjio=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=SEUkIgxtFAgnQDyTalzbCda3QaagvAbZFITJk8Cdx20Om44rzyrmdJRIf7L0K9Y0MxfTLfFNj05Q5a3tkW1VOlLw9sO54JXhjOna2+fm6uZMt1VzmT8hdGnFA3RU9CZ8L7XLMOe53ThoFiiw7xFHpSSPwL7TdnjM8PyCGoq0r2452JxJAqzQ1JDORrG4FJryjlOtv//DtcUxCaCqtVMSYSHAK5h7SoMkRVAE60KpaBZO8FoYP+FwGeR1H3gWvpYQEKpKKbM8UPe6JHAJG9AelaYmAN+71ICruPCLYmCWyOW93nSeWfHNKUqoByXKTTIs5utXqn6+KjKfug5CRPemCw== X-YMail-OSG: 3PTG0y4VM1kJkbcVDs0SloVtmAOt0LiziFgOexYwntCsoeJ1KlHloAHp.lRovUL QsvFNby4KyajPmB27mIIrZ9gKo70Yjv2R01kjnBDMuFs.pmiNXr4STK.fUoKWBuWdcxxAlzqi5cH _PmHmrAi.lpGPPuCVQtGtmr8s2yhtIoK3xhLEFhH3c57ginn.iQlq8E5TqlUqhbmZfu8lgOD._Tw 4o9_eA91d8xD6d0wjZIl7n2.3wgZBkL1GZF2ZdnBO4O5lgWF7.iGAsG4d_.bGvUszc_W4seTzr5P iNg7rCZmb6UzY3W74Iv_.SspXbbDsSTUQX0_n_eo6la6XZnm7sZRJP_zDMuiaKnNx5_KxSRB4Uro slPG9DQf0MVcvPEE0pyTpKA80vtPG4hyM5wmRPkHpR_hV7hemwPBc_jgeWkdXGIRXpZ_l_IJE0Tt vKqEMzsJXYdHweTSJ.paF1uADIs_g0JsaV5HN8GgzNTPLX.1OfhVv82.lCjUATdFnHoRpzgRkn7N M9v1F.pEZYRBDuBSo.CeOxH4HZy.9gYLzN.3WeLKvNf9iqzvdULcpYp_cPG5NeYPnvv0Btj0PLMl sY7wbKAYjY5BAjitLCtF7elak3bLspmDrDm5ukzteo7NPIi3Fy8mEhoY8AEt0d0SLi0qqwQQDTbI my9bI7c4W5vuGgysPe.SLjRiucQYUsn2znSgg1u0wIWhPPHXIa6hBaiAc7ea.ABwhFlSVmWcbRaN Fl4MRhZ7pfc2QiPe.qpe8lsIBdJ3M1RnlssOA0uGBkilRHqgZp7BDDj6jqOsIyKVzeYNHC7vLYN4 aY9UAhx0dIxq7No1AyeaqOVZF3Fq5msfusRhSRoRGB X-Sonic-MF: Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic307.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:54:12 +0000 Original-Received: by hermes--canary-production-sg3-cfddc4f9d-v5tn7 (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID a34196d6de9e6b6aa6e697277a7d4975; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:54:05 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <868rs2h4u6.fsf@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22andr=C3=A9s_ram?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=ADrez=22's?= message of "Mon, 18 Apr 2022 13:57:21 +0000") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.20048 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.163.190.33; envelope-from=luangruo@yahoo.com; helo=sonic307-10.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288633 Archived-At: andr=C3=A9s ram=C3=ADrez writes: > Hi. Po Lu. > >>>>>> "Po" =3D=3D Po Lu writes: > > > [...] > > > Po> What about this? > > This patch also does NOT fix it. > > But I have noticed inside x_error_quiter there is a message about > ignoring BadName errors. > > Could this kind of X error be ignored safely also?. No. It will interfere with handlers set by other programs. x_catch_errors should catch the error before it is propagated to x_error_quitter. I wonder why it isn't working. I will look into this some more, thanks.