From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56459: 29.0.50; Edebug disables Eldoc Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:48:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87sfmg1bpf.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87zghieol4.fsf@gmail.com> <871qurzzyv.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmibzx0k.fsf@gnu.org> <20220731195223.90596.FMU217810@trabanten-schwein.prv.splode.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37041"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: max.brieiev@gmail.com, eliz@gnu.org, 56459@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noah Friedman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 01 12:49:38 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oISzS-0009Sy-3k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:49:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60116 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oISzQ-0004mh-Uf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 06:49:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54668) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oISys-0004jF-6i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 06:49:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49668) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oISyr-0006pi-Tn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 06:49:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oISyr-0005HH-Pt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 06:49:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 10:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56459 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 56459-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56459.165935092120258 (code B ref 56459); Mon, 01 Aug 2022 10:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56459) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2022 10:48:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39417 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oISyW-0005Gg-S4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 06:48:41 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:44752) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oISyV-0005GS-8n for 56459@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 06:48:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nrnN0RsF5+kDtGG8M/ZRkYgcpmFh25jctGD+kXWFqO0=; b=KHSeaSmXmo0ZayRDswGqsNw2q/ kQYC6V0a3GX7BkCkxLI5htnhpN4nLXoQKlx6r+8dzf2FM7zVaHg5+MZRqSNiGFud92ek9TLUGQOnq STIX73OUfFaTtZ8mmBh5rB1UmDjEtR3wDKZBz3eU4KqvaKAkz6koTW5EJsqBdeaQC5hA=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oISyK-0007jW-TW; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:48:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20220731195223.90596.FMU217810@trabanten-schwein.prv.splode.com> (Noah Friedman's message of "Sun, 31 Jul 2022 19:52:23 -0700 (PDT)") Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAElBMVEX38OGzhHqZaWPR p6I8Jif///9pXq4yAAAAAWJLR0QF+G/pxwAAAAd0SU1FB+YIAQojIuJbzcgAAAGlSURBVDjLdZQN lusgCIWdZhZQNBsQs4AYZwGvlP2v6V38iWnmDOc0bf2AKyhxDuaZiELGp1TDV3YDhFJBFmZWYR0g lB0A3p6bNRCx5EoF1RZqqQ5bcos9c/OP/gQ7AHyzqJ+pOggjEzyoA2i7sYztje0aKDUgv0w643ER BwirGihlvwLLsm4VuG4THNLq2JcJrrZ0jc3AXvblF6gtQfQfoLg8szXwQiHwP2s/I6Tuan9I1PQR IdYr536URYrP6QTawENhonwB0TTcI3lDGiZ4EX4dHq7Bb5InEJToDn0XFHMkmkCZk/vWt1X59QGQ rWwAVUkuoNnL/n2zFfMJpINwB/q0MmfEeoKIQn/gl25ANo5prSXeNNT2B+O7BpK1rvwCMXMNvQMp zNsFNHVZhRKu9AWUDhKxlxoSGngfLVMgmwA/mgOwwEsCkUlztJAujrOolxOziROgCZ6HPEup2TFn tJ7g38EAbQsfQL8oLaXXSH6m0kRxAL2KW2qMTQO1KXbDW0twzfI8GHV4UTxbrzCXeXbN3gcdiA3y xp05t+yjuymTH+v6H3YVq1Wo0B4DAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIyLTA4LTAxVDEwOjM1 OjM0KzAwOjAwHQFMpQAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMi0wOC0wMVQxMDozNTozNCswMDow MGxc9BkAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Tuxedomoon's _Ship Of Fools_: "The Train" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:238403 Archived-At: Noah Friedman writes: > So in the current snapshot I'm running, 9dc0fdfdc1 (2022-07-02 07:04:32), > it looks like the check for edebug mode was removed already Sorry, I don't follow -- the code currently is (defun eldoc-display-message-no-interference-p () "Return nil if displaying a message would cause interference." (not (or executing-kbd-macro (bound-and-true-p edebug-active) ... So the check for edebug is still there. > and the behavior is still that only the edebug results are visible; > that is, eldoc's messages aren't covering up the edebug messages, but > they aren't showing up below them either and they're not even showing > up in any mode line. > > So the practical upshot is, I see no change in behavior; whatever > motivated that change seems to be a non-issue now. If I remove that check, I don't see any problems -- stepping through the code doesn't trigger eldoc, so there's no covering up of messages. (But moving the cursor after stepping triggers eldoc, but that seems fine.)