From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#58799: Make winner key sequences repeatable in repeat-mode Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 16:42:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87sfj4ngn2.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87y1t2zl1s.fsf@cassou.me> <87fsf9vdr6.fsf@gmail.com> <87v8o5ts06.fsf@gmail.com> <87lep1tmie.fsf@gmail.com> <871qqss31s.fsf@gmail.com> <87a65coytd.fsf@gmail.com> <87wn8gni65.fsf@gmail.com> <83o7tsdncd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16876"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 31 16:44:05 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1opWxH-0004B8-U5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 16:44:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opWwW-0005mn-7r; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 11:43:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opWwQ-0005jN-A9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 11:43:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opWwG-0004sj-H8; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 11:43:09 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id v7so1596504wmn.0; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 08:42:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=6yBesBA2tslsiuXJG3mL4jHm1cq1XN9UK08uyeXg0NE=; b=Kt2nm3Nl3n0epS638iwnWQwqAz5xi6LfX734wkjpdNYRrzL1XrNNL33nA5+91QMy/f dnOV//DppCKBmd5g1cD6Tk7RJUHfSlaK9VBmn/kw1vEJph6s9t0ir5eI+2A/JRCt7oAp aI8HHq3EL0BwjBHX3aWSSUo94q1Ja6LvbU7gh/2l9VEN6nfGh2HtQj9UAXak6BoSnBxT UigxwTmNeVQcm0uEftHIdONjsAqrNW2OKYS46+aZrl1AovUlHfkQxTLbMOCAWUN3SaKR 1logwka3Yz6EsElUc6GCo27kCy7W5O98yNPC3q99btUEy3/tnhjccvRYok5R7YaXzdo+ 0waA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6yBesBA2tslsiuXJG3mL4jHm1cq1XN9UK08uyeXg0NE=; b=TRCjhCXKRSetxtI3sfiS9fgyi8I+nJ+LGFn9zbvmmtJMTib/vrH501Hes6jOPBCoZ2 DFjaaH08z9gHLcRNvIpuMqpM1K/jxobnu83uonbVt9e83QcqS3WLMDlAfLJSpdX2XIhC xo7ISTdIn8RTteooG55hFa2cM7yzSVMmvXYI38VlUoz7tegi0gtPuV2tY5L8wtal6kaL Mg33I/R44x20Hj7Fmjf3zQF3/sTjKQOZ3pTX8aSV/25bKkz3gjWFfksOi1gXTZYJL54r B+M4lRqr3hI1iCMxZ6OrgJhkMQ1AmTYFPB9Doj8+P5X1rAa8L68ZcLnUDlsDCCPgNA5b QB4g== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2JoYCXAThgeCcjKhljbN7+08WFiwkk0KMHBDDG+0OToTBbLZaN Cwv/QiJxz8OuNyJfmtzj+ZduwWHl6y4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5vtvNE1wqdFguVoSWA7etXvu1YVRp2ufTv6NjZf3WNDc3iGd6vao3dkswYZwnSGcIINYUBgA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb81:0:b0:3c0:f8fc:ea23 with SMTP id m1-20020a7bcb81000000b003c0f8fcea23mr18946980wmi.31.1667230978286; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 08:42:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([82.66.8.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p2-20020a5d4582000000b00228d52b935asm7484452wrq.71.2022.10.31.08.42.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 31 Oct 2022 08:42:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83o7tsdncd.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 31 Oct 2022 17:28:18 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::334; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x334.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:298866 Archived-At: >>>>> On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 17:28:18 +0200, Eli Zaretskii said: >> make[3]: Entering directory '/home/rpluim/repos/emacs/lisp=CA=BC >> ELC winner.elc >>=20 >> In toplevel form: >> winner.el:314:15: Warning: Invalid =E2=80=98kbd=E2=80=99 syntax: "[l= eft]" >>=20 >> Eli? Lars? Is this overkill for such a rare case? Eli> I don't know. I guess it depends on how many people will be tripp= ed Eli> by this. The change itself is small enough, I think. 0, it turns out, as there=CA=BCs already a runtime check for this case =F0= =9F=98=80 Motto: test the existing code before proposing changes Robert --=20