From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57848: 29.0.50; Problems with private tab-line-tab-name-function Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 08:35:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87sfhe5vol.fsf@web.de> References: <8735cs53vn.fsf@web.de> <868rkxretr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87k04hldsl.fsf@web.de> <86bkptmcrx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h6zks72x.fsf@web.de> <87k044swwl.fsf@web.de> <86sfishabd.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8735apc52o.fsf@web.de> <864jv4m3xh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86r0y6ag8n.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <875yfidwl4.fsf@web.de> <86fsem567h.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878rkckhl9.fsf@web.de> <86v8mcd8at.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1007"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 57848@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 17 08:37:26 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p6Rl8-000AbD-6R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 08:37:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p6Rkm-00080E-MB; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 02:37:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p6Rkl-0007zX-5a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 02:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p6Rkk-0000SX-RI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 02:37:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p6Rkk-00041B-Ba for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 02:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 07:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57848 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57848-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57848.167126257215423 (code B ref 57848); Sat, 17 Dec 2022 07:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57848) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2022 07:36:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54381 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p6Rjt-00040d-9T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 02:36:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:46659) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p6Rjn-00040D-Sr for 57848@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 02:36:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1671262557; bh=WQpNi9l2KU7ye8LrbV+VEtc6vW3x101il5YFOWtBXAs=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=A3GhOlO3amGpR4zydvUwhZ7vI/cFXg8dDn4yrb1dzqmjeNNDcKlKIq9vLZe2P8Qwd hcyKZqi1Fz4cfvRRAvYEwL6MwpxF3NWqKgE7LsamrXNC2h6ZWb864nagfY/DnguPiZ IMEv3q3IZvNLzUQbx+cyWPVFfbSrTvrR6D28+WQ4BsUZl6e9rE6sctKqW2CoGTtZ1j 1VTZnemXaH7XcwvxXXNWmd6iOp8M7+pnWCggTkEUVPmx2d9dZhDfrmaklEyh+zLuV3 3LFpTsKB74pfUff7Bb1vKnTIHRuhXspSWmjyZaa6TftWonzEAVflDFm1xY3Gg5FMRZ 5FD21gFLgr3sw== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([92.76.229.140]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb105 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N0Igv-1ojgDa0VM7-00wtay; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 08:35:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86v8mcd8at.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Thu, 15 Dec 2022 19:16:58 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:AXQN3rkwmEk6afECgKx9lVdjUQqqsvPwySvbWgIR+v1rw5TjIMP zkEr3iYSKnHC1mtR7KXIzDf7CspTjzhzY8CtJiVab/AJWZgHHduFVF4ZaHeD3Ug4xRf80dK MCsb3uz/qGJprlntaL/s25ySbk5yNOGv0E0C59RwKx6FX5Llw1OqMWtjBs+gf7Z8k4o8XEP vRTl1KOyn4t2TtHilLjsg== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:ZJRUEFcv8lE=;U3/DD6Aqaphca6tLO7UPXNGFNj3 ELen3TQxRzBVsCLlfit48dMvKAZGmpzxB/Wo4xLESTfAdWX4zink5O4G9w3/cbHknpUB5Vyh7 h0JompUXR6/HPhk6I04CLOh+ovFD680fD8xndvmphAl17DWUkd2XjK0ETG+ayRskc/nOV88v/ JTc4GmAJo9rlW3u+pXjGgSEra+JuJNEY72e/f0iP3hz9O18955RHFCLQW8gfa73qWTc5J7ruL tOKPkV4rGEIMbjKLZwpX+1zM48J5ELgOAyI6pdJjAuHODUQwIgS/SbGSMuSEXsz+MGS3AlRV2 MykGoRp8M48wcAw8ASbw0L+xvJJY3P8BaYeWrMvwL9XPR0FIX7yE5ck24rcIVj3kntlzb2tvi vsjdj1KQvac87HzGqaLG81ztLgCoLRrHDhFYHATyKlSYSq8pd41bCdXyLIA57JV7szo9iyGAF +R19Y6vgl1L9+93X5P4WOfYdr6YhyNex5jAL+nTs0FND22WeFKvSqukKaFVl59RnDPRtgUNTH OvCApB2VMotbWmwumxNqgqyWHmenuTfCo/apC9+2VCKelfO1dVC3OT2ifIdPEsRTYF1tFYjdp jzjjEX28oIkPCCNR8fItuz/KJZllS+poHLvntRLgIq9pkxS8+WW/8d1vsayS6M6Oe+rBnaOhg VmP5Rlz9P5RDiK/Jw5B5NINxi7Xr7e9TeOa+xhHN+Dgngbv0hvESMzPjN8XTRvdxGNO8Hl21e Z++X9JSzMMbAfP+JRkWfhZK1JOEPDiN90hs8OknwIhAPxgzOBo4ABFbJ6RnPxpcXe1XRE00e X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:251260 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: > I tried to implement the window-local tab-line by using a window-parameter. > But the immediate drawback was that the keys 'C-x ' (previous-buffer) > and 'C-x ' (next-buffer) can't be used anymore to go to the > previous/next tab that is the same as the buffer in the window-buffers > list. Thanks for still working on this issue. Obviously I don't see why that happened without looking at what you did. Personally I don't like the idea of coupling the tab order with any existing buffer order. Why do we need to do that in the general case? Isn't that calling for side effects? Thanks, Michael.