From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master b5bbb29634e 1/5: Merge from origin/emacs-29 Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 10:36:55 +0000 Message-ID: <87sf87flx4.fsf@localhost> References: <168941374579.21359.4311609468242997473@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20230715093546.7067CC06C72@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87jzu7dpio.wl-herbert@gojira.at> <877cpndzqo.wl-herbert@gojira.at> <83edjtq8p6.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkewbyof.wl-herbert@gojira.at> <83wmxkpzqr.fsf@gnu.org> <877cpkelk2.fsf@localhost> <87r0nscz02.wl-herbert@gojira.at> <83edjspjfb.fsf@gnu.org> <87pm3ccska.wl-herbert@gojira.at> <838ra0pfca.fsf@gnu.org> <87msyfipx5.fsf@localhost> <83ledzoai4.fsf@gnu.org> <87jztjin53.fsf@localhost> <83h6ono20s.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5020"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: herbert@gojira.at, acorallo@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 25 12:37:36 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qZUC7-000153-Hp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 12:37:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZUB7-0006DH-AZ; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:36:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZUB5-0006D9-L5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:36:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZUB2-0007Ss-Ma for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:36:31 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58AC9240028 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 12:36:26 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1692959786; bh=jbTgRc2jlUlrL/g5XXBxPKdeuIiOjDUMjXoXdZAItjA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=YVz6+l1NmD0c2u/x+tJanBXqCefSFpfqFmbv1sWpgBwPH5BDW+Dj6o8yGgGbYvJfU deNPBaA6/v2xYZzSvPkVSYZYyaIvBGezqV2tiwS+F0qigCwfdf3c4xtlEbTN4Zk0CC oC+aG3JLKwhMcR9LABWGjCeegk49xHWq7QDUFSyGRIH1AP+N9UeM2V0J8/z71Fbg5e o3dO89q/1O3HHJTdOcAf/AwbScrTQ/itOAvDO2lg6OlBG/6lcNMMA/lv3XytN8WRxd y9POeLMO/KvmMAkrTE/r5s/TrPGtsq/QTaEh3TxljVspAhK6mUSgiU3+1buwro3Xx6 0xTRnWTbO/QAQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RXGZx4clkz6twn; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 12:36:25 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83h6ono20s.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309212 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > Where (in what code) did you see this assumption? >> >> `package--reload-previously-loaded' > > That probably needs to be fixed, but is package.el relevant to the > issue discussed here? Org is part of Emacs, so I don't expect > package.el to be involved. I do not think that this particular part of the code is responsible. Just suspect that other places might have similar logic omission. (Aside: that specific code _was_ a problem in Emacs 28, but I was unable to create reproducer on master and did not report the problem. So, it might be perfectly fine, or not. Someone more familiar with package.el may need to take a look - I can report on emacs-devel or debbugs if you think that it is worth it) Also, I doubt that Org has anything to do with handling .el.gz files - we do not fiddle with package loading, except in `org-assert-version'. But there is nothing in there that seems relevant to the issue at hand. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at