Re: License Notice for ELPA packages

[Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org>]

Arash Esbati wrote:

> I'm about to update the license notice header for files
> distributed with AUCTeX and wanted to ask if there is
> a preferred one for ELPA package. I've seen several versions
> compared to this[1]:
>
> • vertico.el says it is part of GNU Emacs, and then uses the
>   license for small programs[2].
>
> • pulsar.el says it is NOT part of GNU Emacs with the part
>   for small programs[3].
>
> • svg-lib.el is also NOT part of GNU Emacs, but uses
>   a diffent last paragraph than in [1,4].
>
> • pinentry.el says it is part of GNU Emacs, talks also about
>   GNU Emacs in other places as well[5].
>
> Where to go?

Where I would go?

I would write a program to do it, and if I changed my mind
later, I would change the program and have it do it all over.

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal