From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#73530: [PATCH] Add imenu index function for Djvu files in doc-view Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 20:11:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87setjhcm6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8734ljg6f5.fsf@gmail.com> <86msjr6ayu.fsf@gnu.org> <874j5ziudn.fsf@gnu.org> <87y13bel5m.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39992"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.6; emacs 31.0.50 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 73530@debbugs.gnu.org, "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" To: Visuwesh Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 28 20:13:03 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1subwE-000AFd-E1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 20:13:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1subvm-0003mW-7m; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:12:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1subvk-0003lk-0j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:12:32 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1subvj-00048s-O1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:12:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=qWkVmTDJ5n/foQnPPvUxizS9Fi0ObkceY0Rj/nMKq3Y=; b=b3WagF9+f6x+fzZSMsxjDd8fLJYc8G94WFh4QxKBcXzeO0Ok6RCmAXs2BtcLJtwF1joAFv4LgrGFJawgG7PbuqtmqUqxVX/nYVSp2KCNoFuTlqrF6NvkFaGd9LmIjlXN90s1hcNlG9fPKLYLpVHd4l5DVaEiwfHtGzpbIqvXwnD9E8vLOukkwLVmHMZifb7eRd7ZTiLiop36q1fniI03OG1GgnH4d1b0sSRrTb8zEGTaxo6Cae5RIqzGsW8bCZtHzZHHGppay2laFd5KzvH4XJ+UE3QjMJcR2qK7RHBr8uLBJOPggZTRCa1qHBPp3nqNYxX+qpOyLSsRjfy7sDxMlg==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1subwD-00015W-TO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:13:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tassilo Horn Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 18:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73530 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 73530-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73530.17275471504125 (code B ref 73530); Sat, 28 Sep 2024 18:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 73530) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Sep 2024 18:12:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38640 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1subvh-00014T-Op for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:12:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40738) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1subvf-00014B-4o for 73530@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:12:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1subv3-0003yv-Uq; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:11:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=qWkVmTDJ5n/foQnPPvUxizS9Fi0ObkceY0Rj/nMKq3Y=; b=prRJWC3vWPDFx7hVfy0q 1vLPhvDSKEbW1sZgfSCe8jG3OHfrZOvZMUkvHlsFxk641quAvN/q4CFoiGwYdtk9Zv/UsJnq47F6c 2bUb8VSHdqhWkHnyxFu3IEcTpk7rQq8o0ymlzH23HmA7GKQw+nu5+wJimSdsDqeLKOL7zGS3xBu+c 1XYd/AIDpW6U5EBugNqQLpaT07e287iqMcQnTYiBki7beg7U+OlYTpczBG/2Qbs8fNvMnNJuOiMiQ o6oOzHMO1y6KBlWqf5FlLJPa5WicTtYxmwL3G6fR57fX+4PPx/RcgDFIgy89P6Wk8S+6pCQNzt/du n1d4Zo0/buPIiw==; X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrvdduuddgleejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnh htshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvvefujghffgffkfggtgesthdtredttdertden ucfhrhhomhepvfgrshhsihhlohcujfhorhhnuceothhsughhsehgnhhurdhorhhgqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeluddvgeefuddvjeekfeetleegtefgveehhfeuffeuffeghefg ueefgfdvffegtdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhorhhnodhmvghsmhhtphgruhhthhhpvghrshhonhgrlhhithihqdekieej feekjeekgedqieefhedvleekqdhtshguhheppehgnhhurdhorhhgsehfrghsthhmrghilh drfhhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeegpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthho pehjrghosehgnhhurdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepjeefheeftdesuggvsggsuhhgshdrgh hnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegvlhhiiiesghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehv ihhsuhifvghshhhmse X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ib2b94485:Fastmail In-Reply-To: <87y13bel5m.fsf@gmail.com> (Visuwesh's message of "Sat, 28 Sep 2024 23:05:33 +0530") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:292598 Archived-At: Visuwesh writes: >>> doc-view-imenu-enabled >> >> Indeed. And while we are here: doesn anyone know why we have an >> option to disable imenu support? I see that we have that since Jose >> contributed the initial imenu support but why? I can't see any harm >> done if it was always enabled and would give a user-error like "For >> imenu support for XXX files, program YYY has to be installed" or >> something when invoking imenu. And why someone might want to disable >> it even if the required program is available is beyond my >> imagination. I mean, if you don't want to use imenu, then just don't >> invoke it... > > I was wondering the same thing, especially since the cost of making the > imenu index is not that high. So lets ask Jose (added to Cc). Bye, Tassilo