From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pip Cet via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: scratch/igc: Avoid MPS being interrupted by signals Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 12:11:54 +0000 Message-ID: <87septec8n.fsf@protonmail.com> References: <87ldvlg17a.fsf@protonmail.com> Reply-To: Pip Cet Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37549"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Emacs Devel To: =?utf-8?Q?Gerd_M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 08 13:30:18 2025 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tVVCU-0009Z5-7S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 13:30:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVVBo-0003id-2J; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 07:29:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVUuz-00018A-Mo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 07:12:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-40133.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.133]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVUun-0007h5-9f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 07:12:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1736338316; x=1736597516; bh=1qaCBqKcE8F46d/kn7pt7WDveyrvQxpRSrZltCDJLhI=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=l2cDjh+f+Zm/LEO746wWgrsIrDlh0Xuelkec2ZdoWhXw3kQrWhNveIy838kmXszPE SHF72X5+P+Q/vmITAfIgzi6BTUC71M4KPly6+9K8tmWWhT3Wp9CVi/F94C+p8wa6Iu DMeea9Ztg9pY/GsaeDZTs7Cj2Bq5fsrgnlpCWkAg/4d1rfSb2wJmE23Dkmoh2b4m66 RG+eamzP1ao7tuUyBxpU15qiBqXZG8wKs6FkiHlOKUmiki5Q8Ew0bGz25YsGLCK4Hg waOyA9DdraOx0t5V9LKKDjqUqI5B3rhq4PDUSM/7bVVPq3WQHSsYyH+NgF3ogfKAzk uSM/s6dLEHE3w== In-Reply-To: Feedback-ID: 112775352:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: f5a5189c0686e7daa5a47c372d4742ca166af04e Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.133; envelope-from=pipcet@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40133.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 07:29:31 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327787 Archived-At: Gerd M=C3=B6llmann writes: > Pip Cet writes: > >> I don't know what you decided wrt scratch/igc and Eli. > > I just looked at the situation. The branch was stuck, the discussions > were stuck. Everyone is entitled to have his worries of course, but I'm > poking about in the fog why Eli is worried, and I'm obviously unable to > explain things well enough or induce enough trust to make this work. > > That's why I think it's currently not wise pursuing a merge, at least > with the persons involved so far. It's too draining and in the end only > leads to ill feelings. > > Whatever. +1 to all of this. I've kind of started collecting changes which Eli vetoed, but that wasn't as much a conscious decision as it was "let's push this". I need to stop and think about what I want done with those. > Someone from the outside is needed to solve this. Maybe Daniel can > explain things better. Or maybe one should ask Stefan Monnier to get > involved, or the other maintainers, I don't know. Ah. I wasn't sure whether your message was supposed to get more of a reaction from Eli than it did. I agree, in any case, that it would be best for Someone Else to help solve this (but I'm not sure what to do if that fails to happen). Thanks! Pip