From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: public@heslin.eclipse.co.uk Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Mouse-1 behaviour changed in gnus? Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 12:06:36 +0000 Message-ID: <87r77k5jjn.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1136641889 3599 80.91.229.2 (7 Jan 2006 13:51:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 13:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 07 14:51:28 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EvETf-0000X9-4b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 14:51:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EvEVT-0006ZE-Mo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 08:53:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EvDRi-0003Oh-7Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 07:45:22 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EvDJO-00011P-6d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 07:36:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EvCsF-0001gA-OM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 07:08:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1EvCuA-00088A-9I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 07:10:42 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EvCqI-0001iu-21 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:06:42 +0100 Original-Received: from 213-152-32-235.dsl.eclipse.net.uk ([213.152.32.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:06:42 +0100 Original-Received: from public by 213-152-32-235.dsl.eclipse.net.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:06:42 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 213-152-32-235.dsl.eclipse.net.uk User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:JDWgLQvztw84mLtzVYE/UHBWKug= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:48816 Archived-At: Piet van Oostrum writes: >>>>>> Piet van Oostrum (PvO) wrote: > I found that the problem only occurs when the cursor is not inside the > *Article* buffer. So it probably is related to this change: > > > 2005-12-27 Richard M. Stallman > > * mouse.el (mouse-drag-region-1): When remapping mouse-1 to > mouse-2, go back to previously selected window, so it's > selected when mouse-2 command runs. I updated from CVS last week for the first time in months, and one thing I noticed happening was that sometimes, when the frame is split into two windows, and I click with the mouse-1 button on a link in the non-selected window (such as in a *Help* buffer, or on a URL highlighted by goto-address in a text buffer), instead of following the link, whatever random text happens to be in the clipboard (?) is pasted at point in the selected window. It is as if, instead of clicking mouse-1 on a link in the non-selected window, I had clicked mouse-2 somewhere in the selected window. Using mouse-2 follows the link correctly. This only happens sometimes, and I have not come up with a recipe to reproduce it reliably, so I didn't report it, but it looks possible that the change Piet quoted above might be implicated. Peter