From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [werner@suse.de: Several problems in KDE/KWin] Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 01:07:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87r6hyjbgw.fsf@escher.local.home> References: <87k5nqqtfv.fsf@member.fsf.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1197072474 1054 80.91.229.12 (8 Dec 2007 00:07:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 00:07:54 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 08 01:08:03 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J0nEg-0003hz-3j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 01:08:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0nEP-0004iy-2T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:07:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J0nEE-0004Wi-EZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:07:34 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J0nEC-0004Tl-Nt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:07:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0nEC-0004TV-EU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:07:32 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J0nEC-0002ol-4D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:07:32 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J0nE5-0008Aj-Vw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 00:07:25 +0000 Original-Received: from i5387dbf2.versanet.de ([83.135.219.242]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 00:07:25 +0000 Original-Received: from Stephen.Berman by i5387dbf2.versanet.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 00:07:25 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: i5387dbf2.versanet.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:84856 Archived-At: On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:08:00 +0100 Andreas Schwab wrote: > If you try to maximize a second time the frame is actually truely > maximized. This is so if you maximize either vertically (mouse-2) or horizontally (mouse-3) but not for both dimensions simultaneously (mouse-1). > But unmaximizing restores intermediate, nearly maximized > size, not the original one. This behavior has varied in the course of Emacs 22 development. For further details see . Steve Berman