Re: line-move-visual never set to nil?

[Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>]

"Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> writes:
> I think this case is special. The special thing is the relation between
> the visual move and the buffer point. That relation changes according to
> something that is rather unrelated with the buffer contents but can
> easily be changed by the user. That makes the relation very volatile.

Not really, given that (1) window-width changes quite rarely,
and (2) most macros are used immediately (in the same buffer/window) and
then discarded (or rather, forgotten about).

Anyway, what you're suggesting seems every bit as bad, or worse, than
the problem it's purporting to solve -- without, as far as I can see,
any actual evidence that there _is_ a problem (have we gotten any bug
reports?).

-Miles

-- 
Freebooter, n. A conqueror in a small way of business, whose annexations lack
of the sanctifying merit of magnitude.