From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done? Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:00:00 +0100 Message-ID: <87r645hq0v.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <87vdtu332o.fsf@red-bean.com> <200812090245.mB92j83j019610@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <87r64e8nqf.fsf@canonical.com> <873agm9zmh.fsf@canonical.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229587218 14612 80.91.229.12 (18 Dec 2008 08:00:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:00:18 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 18 09:01:25 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LDDoy-0001Rx-8a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:01:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59991 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LDDnm-0004Ps-5W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:00:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LDDnh-0004Pc-L5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:00:05 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LDDng-0004PD-O6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:00:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56044 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LDDng-0004PA-LK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:17590) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LDDnf-0000Zg-Ss for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.64.15]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LDDne-0000qu-OE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:00:02 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E530789A93A for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:00:01 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (deliver.uni-koblenz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07699-10 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:00:00 +0100 (CET) X-CHKRCPT: Envelopesender vrfy tassilo@member.fsf.org Original-Received: from thinkpad.tsdh.de (dhcp91.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.71.91]) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4833E789A7B0 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:00:00 +0100 (CET) Mail-Copies-To: never Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <873agm9zmh.fsf@canonical.com> (Karl Fogel's message of "Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:59:50 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uni-koblenz.de X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107027 Archived-At: Karl Fogel writes: Hi Karl, > Progress report on the 4 bugs we've highlighted as blockers: > > 1) 'bzr log' only takes a single file argument > (https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/211852) > > Developer vila has commented in the bug, but there is no > timeline to fix it. I'm asking vila whether he plans to. > > 2) 'bzr log SUBDIR' doesn't show all changes under SUBDIR > (https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/97715) > > Developer abentley has commented that this is hard (at least, > that's how I interpret "This isn't really practical without > changes to the inventory format.") Is this one definitely a > blocker for us, or just a nice-to-have? I don't have any bzr repository checked out currently, so I couldn't test my assertion. But reading the docs of bzr-1.10 it seems to me that `bzr diff' only accepts files as arguments (no directories), too. Maybe that could make syncing parts that also have an external repository difficult. One candidate suffering from that could be org-mode, which resides at lisp/org/. Bye, Tassilo -- A child of five could understand this! Fetch me a child of five!