From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: eshell compatibility Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:40:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87r5rpb66l.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258991130 8655 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2009 15:45:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:45:30 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 23 16:45:23 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NCb6Q-0006A1-CQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:45:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54261 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NCb6N-0003yi-JM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:45:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NCb23-0002Ka-O2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:40:51 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NCb1z-0002Hk-6n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:40:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42668 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NCb1y-0002Ha-Qt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:40:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:35474) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NCb1y-0006Dg-5r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:40:46 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2009 15:40:44 -0000 Original-Received: from h-62.96.202.36.host.de.colt.net (EHLO ubuntu.local) [62.96.202.36] by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 23 Nov 2009 16:40:44 +0100 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+lE4syC4alA9C3TL1ZXMzMu3h/zwhYHBzKzpv8t0 q+SYeHKZ0NGuGd User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.71 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117590 Archived-At: Hi, I have prepared patches, which let eshell run processes on remote hosts better than today. Those patches use `file-remote-p' and `start-file-process', both introduced in GNU Emacs 22 and 23, respectively. Eshell contains a lot of compatibility code. Does it mean, eshell is still synchronized upstream, and I must add compatibility code as well? Or could I trust, that the version in trunk is used in GNU Emacs 23, and anybody moving it out must add compatibility code herself? Best regards, Michael.