From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7231: 23.3; Don't rebuild buffer list in iswitchb-visit-buffer Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:22:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87r5foy90j.fsf@telefonica.net> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287340965 25831 80.91.229.12 (17 Oct 2010 18:42:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7231@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 17 20:42:43 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P7YBq-00058C-Qi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:42:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58430 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P7YBq-0002Jl-4v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:42:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54924 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P7YBg-0002IX-3K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:42:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P7YBf-0001Em-5u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:42:27 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53606) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P7YBf-0001Ed-48 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:42:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P7Xoz-0006O7-Na; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:19:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7231 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7231-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7231.128733953424549 (code B ref 7231); Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7231) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2010 18:18:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P7Xos-0006Nu-J3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:18:54 -0400 Original-Received: from impaqm1.telefonica.net ([213.4.138.1]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P7Xoq-0006No-A3 for 7231@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:18:53 -0400 Original-Received: from IMPmailhost2.adm.correo ([10.20.102.39]) by IMPaqm1.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id Krw41f0090r0BT601uNMZH; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:22:21 +0200 Original-Received: from qcore ([83.52.52.115]) by IMPmailhost2.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id KuNL1f0072V89Bn1iuNMRV; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:22:21 +0200 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-TE-authinfo: authemail="981711563$telefonica.net" |auth_email="981711563@telefonica.net" X-TE-AcuTerraCos: auth_cuTerraCos="cosuitnetc01" In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Mon, 18 Oct 2010 01:59:52 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:19:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:40932 Archived-At: Leo writes: > The original change was to address buffer name changes due to packages > such as uniquify.el. But it causes another annoying bug: changing the > order of matches seen by users. > > This reverts it. > > If people are annoyed (which I doubt) by outdated buffer names due to > uniquify.el, The purpose of the patch you reverted was addressing that annoyance, so it is easy to infer that someone indeed was annoyed by that behavior. > one solution is to map the buffer-names to buffer objects > before killing and map them back to names after killing. So why don't you implement that instead of reverting a patch that corrects a bug? (After killing a buffer, having a list containing non-existent buffers is a bug, right? while seeing how the list after the second item is reordered is an annoyance, so you are proposing to re-introduce a bug for avoiding an annoyance) [snip]