From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: elpa.gnu.org (Stale archive-contents?) Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:35:50 -0500 Message-ID: <87r5es3lqh.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <81vd48xive.fsf@gmail.com> <87tyjryhui.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <81fwvar0a4.fsf@gmail.com> <874obqza7f.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87bp5y6yhi.fsf@gnu.org> <87oc9yq63h.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrolm88t.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aalhayiv.fsf@altern.org> <87r5etkofc.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1289424970 16325 80.91.229.12 (10 Nov 2010 21:36:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 10 22:36:04 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PGIKq-0003UC-IQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:36:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52928 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PGIKp-0006Q7-VH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55358 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PGIKj-0006NA-Bi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:35:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PGIKg-00074v-4P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:35:57 -0500 Original-Received: from pantheon-po42.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.101]:47135) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PGIKg-00074V-2D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:35:54 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014007.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po42.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id oAALZpKv006845 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:35:51 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 18B6F16074D; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:35:50 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87r5etkofc.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:45:43 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132528 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > B> But now I have two entries, one for 20101101 and one for 20101110. > > Yeah, I think it should have flushed the older package when elpa.gnu.org > doesn't have it anymore. Installing that invalid package will fail in > any case, but I think what you describe is a bug. This was a bug in package.el; I've just checked in a fix.