From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eric Schulte" Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:05:30 -0700 Message-ID: <87r5cafa7r.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87pqveyct2.fsf@gmail.com> <87ocayl81d.fsf@manor-farm.org> <0E084C6C-6FD1-4C74-BD9F-34F2830B93C5@gmail.com> <87bp6ytacd.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87fwsubckf.fsf@gnu.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsr9wrd.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <8762tnjlrz.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87k4i3i66i.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46585 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PfEPf-0002zd-47 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:28:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfEPY-0003uZ-1d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:28:05 -0500 Received: from mail-pz0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]:37124) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfEPX-0003tr-T3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:27:59 -0500 Received: by pzk27 with SMTP id 27so1345556pzk.0 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:27:57 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jason Dunsmore Cc: Achim Gratz , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > > One last change I would suggest, is that rather than use inline css for > the highlighted source code, we use a css stylesheet by setting the > > (setq org-export-htmlize-output-type 'css) > > Then use a single .css style sheet as done with the "@import(emacs.css)" > in my previous submission. I'm partial to the emacs.css bundled with my > submission over the current code fontification, but that's just me. > While we're fixing things, are there any objections to making the publishing change recommended above? It should significantly reduce the size of pages which contain a large amount of source code, and will make it easier to adjust the fontification inside of code blocks. -- Eric